Posts: From: Registered: |
In short Hanukkah seems to be not true and seems anti Christian. If you are lazy you stop hear if you want to hear a short story read on. If anyone is slothful then you probably will not read this but if you want to know what really happened then read on. If you are slothful then go to where the stars***** are as your starting point. :P Fact fiction you decide.
After the Jewish high priest died Simon III his son Onias III took and he gave his power to his brother Jason as priest. Jason went to the King and gave him a bigger tribute and asked to make the county more democratic and he helped the new priest build gymnasiums, cultural anti theocracy registration, etc. They didn't want the old Jewish theocracy but a more fair social and political class to be fair. Many Jews hated it since many were going to the gymnasiums during the week than the temple, and found that working out was evil despite they were getting physically fit and conditioned. Fanatically religious Jews didn't like it, and they lusted for power. His other brother Menelaus took over as priest by outbidding him. As you see they adapted Greek names since many of them favored it. They had a civil war to decide who the rightful priest is. Menelaus won, became tyrannical, civil war broke out against the Jews fanatical and the moderates that favored Greek law, Menelaus won again, he stole gold from the temple and sold it, Onias III found out and wanted to expose his treachery but Menelaus with the Governor Andronicus quickly killed him. Many Jews, Greeks, and the King were saddened by the event. So far Hanukah seems interesting how the Priests kill other priests. Rumors went around that the King died and Jason came back and found an opportunity again to fight Menelaus and the majority of the people were with him. Menelaus and his men fled to the King which he was alive and the priest said that Jason invaded and got support by the Kings enemies in Egypt. The King was angry after hearing the high priest that his loyal servants betray him with a very treasonous act, they always kill each other, was upset at his loss against the Romans, and his postponement of taking over Egypt. So the king went to put down the rebellion with the help of the Jews and Jason fled and became an exile. While Menelaus helped the king take gold from the temple for the trouble in a way. Despite both Jason and Menelaus being art of the Ancient Greek party they were still rivals. If it was not for Jewish great sins the king would have not went their. If Jason won there would things would have been good but when the fanatical tyrannical Menelaus won things went bad. So the Jews have it backwards which in fact is a rebellion that started the persecution, instigated by fanatical sacrilegious Jews in control. The problems seem never ending with Jews and Menelaus persuaded the King to help bring everyone together and follow Greek rule. So later on they were told to make animal sacrifices, which are still done today by thanking God their thanksgiving turkey. Mattathias and his sons refused and gathered a revolted which they became known as the Maccabees, with other Jews with them. The king again dealing with the Jews never ending civil wars sent an inexperienced commander to stop the revolt, and also sent a letter saying when he the king his son will be in charge and that they will go back to their old customs, and soon after the commander failed to stop the revolt against Mattathias. The commander sent a letter to negotiate with corrupt Menelaus on a settlement on the situation. Menelaus ignored him and made his own demands, and Menelaus himself went to the king The commander later found out that Menelaus despite being the Jewish leader became rich off of stealing from his temples and properties especially form the Maccabees, decided it was best to kill him for his treachery to both Jews and to the King. The Maccabees took over and got rid of the power hungry cabalist liberal priests, and purified their temple which is what Jews celibate but nothing about burning candles since that's just a myth. But the other thing is that they also say it was a victory against the Greeks which was not utterly true and seems racist of them which all the kings didn't treat others like that and others didn't have arguments, and not even the king of that region was to blame since he mainly did what the ruling powers wanted to keep order, and let alone Greeks didn't seem to be the issue but Jews that wanted Greek laws which have been distorted by fanatical priests. Kind of like how fanatical Christians distort god's law and atheists use to that prove they are right that Christianity is violent which is insane. It's a shame that the Jews hurt themselves to be more Christian. The king of the region didn't seem to be a good one that did not think things though well, and when his son took over let them do what they want, but 65 years later under their own rule the Maccabees crucified 800 Pharisees and cut the throat of their wives and children while they watch. There is nothing more deathly than wolves in sheep clothing. ********************************* "The motivation of the Hasmonean (Maccabees) revolt has often been misunderstood. It has been contended that this revolt came in protest to the process and progress of Hellenization in Judaea, but this is patently not the case." "Jewish hellenizers were actually the ones who instigated the persecution.(9) Moreover, the Hasmoneans (Maccabees) themselves quickly adopted Hellenistic mores" Lee Levine "Judaism and Hellenism in Antiquity"
So why attack LIE? "In fact, Jewish Rabbi Daniel Kohn, in answer to the question, "Is the miracle of Chanukah made up?" stated that the whole concept of the miracle of the oil was indeed untrue." "The rabbis may have deliberately lied about the military origins and Hellenistic causes of Hanukkah in order to maintain the holiday but shifted its focus to God and more religious themes out of a greater need for survival!..." Another Rabbi Harry Sky is about resisting assimilation. "When those guys stood up to Hellenization, they stood up to assimilation." "will to Jewishness first or to Israel's survival first" They tried to do the same with the Romans after a while but the Romans took control and didn't give mercy to anyone to anyone traitorous and crush them and exiled them. You can't mix water with oil, the same with Christmas and Hanukah. They win by not assimilating or getting influence and for them to set their religious rule. *** And they say Christmas is inclusive? please! Hosea 4:14 "...a people without understanding will come to ruin!" ================ [This message has been edited by warsong (edited December 20, 2006).] |
Lava Member Posts: 1905 From: Registered: 01-26-2005 |
Oh come on Warsong you've never spun a Dreidel just for fun? Not once? I doubt it ------------------ [This message has been edited by LAVA (edited December 20, 2006).] |
Posts: From: Registered: |
Yes I have Lava but even the dreidel was not Jewish and was used as a gambling toy by their neighbors, they took it into their society and made it into a kids toy. the 4 sides means on the dreidel bet more, bet less, hold, fold... I need to refresh what it means so I may be wrong on what each side meant. Did you read the post and what questions do you have besides asking about Dreidel? :P With all this anti Christ documentary on TV here is something back on the other end of the spectrum which a more logical stance. Ok I will only answer 3 questions about this post since I know many will have off beat questions again. :P lol DON'T be LAZY again people! ------------------ |
Lazarus Member Posts: 1668 From: USA Registered: 06-06-2006 |
Well I wouldn't deny that Jewish people have killed each other and their priests(like in 70 A.D they were massacring each other), but just because a holiday has some tainted origins - does that really matter? If it does then you probably wouldn't celebrate Christmas either - would you? |
HanClinto Administrator Posts: 1828 From: Indiana Registered: 10-11-2004 |
quote: Well, for starters, it is mentioned in the Bible. Whether or not that supports it or not is another debate, but it at least has roots that go back far enough that it's mentioned in John's gospel.
Thanks! --clint |
Posts: From: Registered: |
Laz= You ask as if you didnt read it all. :P The entire holiday is tented from top to bottom, in other words is a lie and anti-Christian so yeah it does matter to spread lies which one of the 10 commandments says. Thou shall not lie especially a big one that is destructive which ignores learning the lesson that perpetuates and encourages repeating history which hurts them and us. Think it though well before replying next time. Han= The time it accrued. Dedication means Hanukkah Christ comments how bad they act 31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. Christ was not celebrating their holiday them but doing his own business. The holiday only includes the Jews and excused non Jews, which Christ was against that since that is why they have been stipend of spreading Christs words as a whole because of those traditions that they follow which puts more fuel to the fire. Their views are anti Christian which Christ comments on them not being part of his following. Their calibration is about hated for others fueled by lies, --- ------------------ |
HanClinto Administrator Posts: 1828 From: Indiana Registered: 10-11-2004 |
quote: Hold on. You're making too big of a jump there bud. Just because the Jews were "doing their own thing" and persecuting Jesus doesn't mean that what the Jews were doing was automatically bad. That would be like saying that because the Jews were celebrating Passover when they crucified Christ, that therefore Passover is t3h 3v1L -- far from it! Keep in mind, I'm not defending the Feast of Dedication here -- I'm merely just saying that the logic you used there to support your argument is faulty. There may be other reasons for not wanting to celebrate the Feast (as you've mentioned), but if you put in non sequitors and hasty generalizations like that, then you do a great disservice to your argument. --clint |
Posts: From: Registered: |
Han I know what you mean but I didnt mean it like that. Jesus was a Jew and Jesus was religious but he didnt partake in the feast. Its not about when but why. Just because mentioned that the NT mentioned it doesnt mean it supports it, for Christ to insult the priests on that particular day at the particular place doesnt help the feast if you read the entire part. So in the end commenting that the NT comments about it as a reference of what time it was is irrelevant, which is what I am saying. ------------------ |
spade89 Member Posts: 561 From: houston,tx Registered: 11-28-2006 |
hey,warsong i just had a quick question for you, why do you care whether hanukah is real or not and whether hanukah means killing or not? i didn't ask you this question because i disagree with you i asked you because i was curious, as christians why should we be concerned with other peoples religions ,and beliefs,and if we should why should we be concerned with specific religious beliefs like judaism or islamism? ------------------ |
NetCog Member Posts: 149 From: Registered: 06-15-2006 |
1. I find your assertion of Jesus vs the Dedication Feast using Scripture to be flawed. Additionally, the stones being picked up were in response to the "blasphemy" that Jesus uttered in claiming to be God. That has nothing to do with the Feast. Now if you've got references elsewhere of Jesus was/is being pro or anti-"Feast" by all means let's see them....but that assertion is or could be just as potentially weak as the assertion by others that Jesus was celebrating or participating in recognizing Hannukah. All the Scripture says is "Jesus was in the Temple/Jerusalem during the Feast". There has been nothing I've read to indicate "Jesus, seeing the Feast underway, spoke against it saying,..."
quote: That's what I'm thinking.... other eg (imho) = Lent, Ramadan, etc, etc.... Shoot...you could even get up tight about at least a handful of the other Jewish holidays which coincide with some manner of God's provision or Christ's attonement...only we as Christians would be looking back while Jews would be looking forward. And you've already posted on one aspect of Christmas' secularization.
A:: B:: C:: 1. 2. And I might suggest: Trust me, I know a bs conclusion when I see it. I spent 3 years with some of the best minds in the state coming up with statements and responses on what were essentially topics picked out of a hat. And I've spent more years than I care to count in discussions like this with people far more likely to spin off to outer space. I've also learned from personal experience that flimsy is a waste of time. ***** see after the p.s. ***** I can enjoy the occasional historical assertion, what I won't abide is staunch conclusions without proof. Hannukah being evil is a pretty staunch conclusion, especially in light that you've (apparently) set it up as something worse than the other dozen or so world-wide recognized holidays. Or is this the topic for the week and should we be expecting another such post in March-April re: Lent or the secularization of Easter, or in September re: Ramadan?
quote: You got pretty close to some good analysis. 1. Jesus was a Jew, and Jesus did observe other Jewish customs and holidays. Such recognition has been stated specifically in the Bible, e.g. Passover. Granted the Passover dealt directly with Jesus' work here on Earth, thus a participatory reference could be expected. A lack of such reference to Jesus' specific participation in a Jewish custom or holiday might indicate the lack of that custom's relevency to the world post-Christ. 2. There would be no real reason to indicate the Feast's occurence in light of the lack of reference by Jesus to it. Ultimately, for me it is an interesting side note. If the Jews want to celebrate Hannukah, fine by me. I won't, it's not my custom, I don't see a need for it. I expect to be able to celebrate Christmas and by extension, in this country, I should be able to allow Jews to celebrate Hannukah. [This message has been edited by NetCog (edited December 21, 2006).] [This message has been edited by NetCog (edited December 21, 2006).] |
Tonnyx Member Posts: 140 From: Indiana, USA Registered: 08-02-2005 |
quote: I interpret John's note about the Feast's taking place to provide a context for the Jews' question: "How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly." Since the Feast of Dedication celebrated the last time the Jews kicked the foreign rulers out, it seems that the question they're asking is, "Are you the one who's going to kick the foreign rulers out, like the Maccabees did? Will you bring about the fullness of what we are celebrating this week?" That's my 186 cedis. ------------------ |
NetCog Member Posts: 149 From: Registered: 06-15-2006 |
Interesting point tonnyx, it makes sense when read that way. |
Posts: From: Registered: |
Every time I reply I keep wondering if people read it since its like I have to always reword what I have to say. Sure I am sloppy many times, but if you don't understand then ask. basically it's a religion to demonize other while lionizing themselves to escape responsibility and blame others. Spade Even Jews try to sell that holiday as a great one for Christians to follow which Christians should not fall into that trap. There is more to explain but you are responsible to know what goes on. I see Christians partaking in the feast sometimes and putting on the yamaka and do other religious customs on the feasts. Even me partaking in any other religious ceremony goes against my beliefs since it acknowledges theirs and weakens our faith which many do not understand that. Just because your goal is straight ahead doesnt mean you have to ignore the things from the sides that are trying to stop you from reaching your goal. Tonnyx
The other Jewish holidays are not as anti Christian or that much or a lie so its not as important to comment on. If you dont know history you will be doomed to repeat. You have to understand why thing are the way they are. To look forward to you to know how to watch out what is trying to take you down. I bet you didnt even most of the things I have stated in this post like many do not so dont come across as a smart *** . I find it hard to believe you even read the post since you can see that many of the sources are from Jewish sources. But how will you know since as you said you dont look at the past and since thats what helps. If you keep on walking forward ignoring things around you expect a kick in the head sooner or later, and that isnt an insult but the reality of it. Are you saying that they didnt build gymnasiums? Are you saying they just kill animals and not eat them? Are you paying attention that I was not talking about Jewish traditions when talking about gyms and sacrifices? Are you paying attention or instigating? Again everything is quoted by Jewish sources backed up by Jews, their opposition of the Greeks, and other sources. Your sloth will not escape judgment. Your assumptions are as always as the phrase goes AssUme. ------------------ [This message has been edited by warsong (edited December 22, 2006).] |
spade89 Member Posts: 561 From: houston,tx Registered: 11-28-2006 |
warsong not all christians that say they are christians are christians,if any christian thinks that hanukah or any other celebration of a non-christian religion is acceptable in christianity then he is not a christian and should be treated the same as all non-christians,there are lots of people trying to decieve us like this,and if we are true christians we will guide all of them towards christ's way .we shouldn't single out any specific religion,we should love all of them just the same,without any discrimination,that's the christian way. ------------------ |
Posts: From: Registered: |
quote: Are you serious? This is one thing many misunderstand. You also seem to use love loosely or give it a lesser meaning when used in that context. Is it the same love as "Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it" Let's not abuse love as so many have, which even the word love is ridiculed by secularists, which you love their beliefs? "16:13 No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Religion is an ideology, a rule of life for some. We have to love people but not their beliefs. Christ does not respect things that are bad. Do you love the devil's view? Do you love Satanism? Do you love voodoo? Satanism is banned in some Europe countries since there reports of occult murders, but you say we should love that the same? When you love, respect, accept what is bad then what is good is diminished. When people are good to evil then they are automatically evil to good. Let them do what they want if it doesn't affect you, but don't say you have to love what they believe. Or as some say love the sinner but not the sin. the feast seem to be a lie, and to lie is a sin "1:9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows." |
spade89 Member Posts: 561 From: houston,tx Registered: 11-28-2006 |
warsong are you serious,why do you keep twisting my words? for your information love is the most important word in my vocabulary , incase you haven't read the bible ,jesus teaches us to love all mankind,even our enemies and persecutors right along those who don't follow our religion, and I DID NOT SAY LOVE THEIR BELIEFS,I SAID LOVE THEM,i am a human just as them and i have no authority to judge them,that is god's job, whatever these people do,and i mean whatever you have no right to discriminate them or single them out and ridicule them,that is just not the christian way,these people are the creation of god,not you.only he has the right to judge them and punish them,you are not a superior to any other human,you are a son of adam just like every human,and no son of adam shall judge his own brother. and why do you keep accusing me of being a satanist,a voodoo and all that, and warsong incase you don't know it is actually possible to love all of humanity without judging them.if you skipped parts of the bible i think it's time you read the parts you skipped.
if you are a follower of christ you'll follow in his footsteps,and christ certainly didn't discriminate sinners,he loved them,no matter what their sin jesus loved them,jesus stood against all form of hate, remember mary magdalen,she was a sinner and she was outcasted ridiculed and and you say that no servant can serve to masters, well exactly my point you also say if you are good to evil then you are evil to good, Luke 6:32 Matthew 5:46 and yes warsong ,god hates those who reject his son(jesus christ),but it is up to him to judge them and up to us to accept jesus and follow in his footsteps.
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠ϖ 4;♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠ 824;♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠ ------------------ |
spade89 Member Posts: 561 From: houston,tx Registered: 11-28-2006 |
oh,i was just reading my post again today,and it seemed like my post was kind of overly-spoken ,and a bit too defensive,well if that is the way you see it(warsong)i apologize warsong . i just wrote the whole thing as my thought was unfolding and at the moment your previous post kind of put on the defensive(you made lots of accusations),and the last note i put about you being involved in politics it was meant to be a light joke(didn't mean anything by it). ------------------ |
Posts: From: Registered: |
I guess you are kidding. lol You said we shouldn't single out any specific religion,we should love all of them Then you say I DID NOT SAY LOVE THEIR BELIEFS,I SAID LOVE THEM It doesnt seem to be present it that way, you probability meant to say what you said in the second quote but the first quote doesnt indicate in the sentence that way. I didnt say you are being any of those other views. I was not talking about people but beliefs so I dont know where you come up with your comments. The information was not just for you since some people believe that, so it was for others are well. Some people say some strange things sometimes, some even say that its ok for a dog to go to church for the services. :| So need for you to argue because of a lack of communication. And your comments are generally what I said. Good thing you reread your reply and think its wrong and so not reread my reply since you are twisting my words lol. As for politics in a way I am, and I agree that they do twist words around but so do marketers, news, entertainment, some religions and historians which this topic is just gave one example of how people hear the other side of the story which doesnt stick well but many eat it up. ------------------ |
spade89 Member Posts: 561 From: houston,tx Registered: 11-28-2006 |
man,you really know how to twist words don't you? ok,maybe you missunderstood my last post so let me re-phrase: i said stuff like "if you are a follower of christ you'll follow in his footsteps,and christ certainly didn't discriminate sinners...." in my last post and i didn't meen to criticize your devotion to christianity,and when i said stuff like "incase you haven't read the bible,..." i didn't mean that you have no knowlege of the bible. that is why i said my last post was overly-spoken in the process of proving my point i felt like i offended you by criticizing the basis of your belief and that was not my intention,my intention was to show you what i see as the truth that's why i made quotes from the bible. i don't believe in saying something and not meaning it i still stand with what i said my last post was a mere apology to the criticizm i put upon you even though you criticize my belief i shouldn't do the same. and what i said was a light joke is the part in ♠'s not the other stuff,and warsong,this maybe a whole new topic but you keep confusing religion and politics,and ideology and belief. there is a big difference between those.
Belief is usually defined as a conviction of the truth of a proposition without its verification; therefore a belief is a subjective mental interpretation derived from perceptions, contemplation(reasoning), or communication. politics: 1 a : the art or science of government b : the art or science concerned with guiding or influencing governmental policy c : the art or science concerned with winning and holding control over a government. ideology: 1 : visionary theorizing see the difference,ideology is theorizing while religion is believing. anyways that's not the topic and i still stand against discrimination,all men are born equal, Romans 3:23 and why do you keep talking about bringing a dog to church? we are talking about people here not dogs?? ------------------ |
Posts: From: Registered: |
Yep, as I thought, definitely a lack of communication. Do we have a translator in the forum? On a side note, atheism is a religion too as categorized by the courts. |
Lava Member Posts: 1905 From: Registered: 01-26-2005 |
quote: OLD topic! And to ANY of you guys, don't even think about resurrecting it! ------------------ [This message has been edited by LAVA (edited December 30, 2006).] |
Lazarus Member Posts: 1668 From: USA Registered: 06-06-2006 |
Warsong, there's generally a communication gap wherever you go, I expect. Why can't I bring a dog to church? (sorry, Lava ) |
spade89 Member Posts: 561 From: houston,tx Registered: 11-28-2006 |
yep,we disagree on manythings warsong but there is one thing i agree with... there is definetly a misunderstanding or communication gap,if there is anything that i said that any of you guys misunderstood i'd be happy to explain.♠♠ ------------------ |
Lava Member Posts: 1905 From: Registered: 01-26-2005 |
quote: You could, before, but Warsong's priest got bit. ------------------ [This message has been edited by LAVA (edited January 01, 2007).] |
Lazarus Member Posts: 1668 From: USA Registered: 06-06-2006 |
I understand it all now! |