c h i e f y Member Posts: 415 From: Surrey, United Kingdom Registered: 03-07-2002 |
1. I am the Lord thy God, ... Thou shalt have no other gods before me. 2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven images. 3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain 4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy 5. Honor thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long. 6. Thou shalt not kill. 7. Thou shalt not commit adultery. 8. Thou shalt not steal 9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor. 10 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house.
can you comply with the ten commandments? if not, why not? law 4. Six days you shall labour and do all your work, but the seventh is a Sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter. Well, every Sunday my son (aged 17) works at CULLENS 5pm - 11pm, he goes to SIXTH form MON - FRI and has SAT off, so I've had it on no. 4 straight off, not only that, I work SHIFT work, for instance I just worked TUES - TUES (8 days straight through) so what does this mean? law 2. is another interesting one, of course I haven't made any graven images but in modern living it is said that we "worship" our cars, our TVs law 3. oh dear, don't look at blitzcoders too close, better move on laws 1 and 5, and all others, I think I comply with them ok, what about you? ------------------ |
||||
Krylar Administrator Posts: 502 From: MD, USA Registered: 03-05-2001 |
Hiya, The good news is that nobody is 100% perfect on these. You're gonna goof them...actually, if it was possible to be 100% perfect on these, why would you need Jesus? The idea isn't to work your butt off to be so perfect that you work your way into heaven. The idea is that you realize you're not good enough and therefore you need Jesus in order to make it. It's a humbling thing. Some people feel that the commandments are "too difficult, too harsh, too demanding...they're impossible!" Is it too harsh to not steal? To not lie, cheat on your spouse, kill, etc.? These aren't harsh, these are just. The problem is that people feel that they are "tied down" by these rules, when the reality is that they are "tied down" by their own invented rules. For example, if a person lies that person is now caught in a web of deceit. One lie leads inevitably to another lie (to cover up the first one), and so on. Now, is it more of a prison to be caught in a web of deceit or to just not lie? You can take most any commandment and apply this thought process to find that it *is* a prison to go against these basic precepts. So, then, we're still going to goof up, right? So does that mean that if we accept Jesus we can goof up all we want? No. It means that we're going to be convicted to NOT goof up. But realizing that we will goof up, we will also repent those mistakes and pray for help on avoiding making them again. Jesus stands before us at the time of judgment, justifying us before the Father. He wipes our slate clean. But when we're here, if we lie (cheat, steal, etc.) we still deal with the consequences of our lies here. You still need to go to your brother and say "hey, I lied..." and ask for forgiveness, or you're going to continue being stuck in that web. Furthermore, don't go to God asking for forgiveness if you know you're going to continue in your web of deceipt. Go to your brother FIRST and straighten things up with him...get his forgiveness...and then go to God for forgiveness. As for the Sabbath: This is a tough subject. "Six days shalt thou labor and do all they work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God. On that day, thou shalt not do any work..." There are tons of arguments over what day this really is. Is it Saturday or Sunday? Does it really matter on the actual day or is it literally 6-days ya work, 1 day ya don't? I've frankly not heard a strong enough case either way, so I'm still on the fence on this issue. And what do you *do* on the Sabbath anyway? Well, if you subscribe to the LAW (not the commandments), then you have a bunch of rules and regulations. If you have accepted Christ's sacrifice, then the commandment's literal "don't work" is all you gotta worry about. I gotta run...this is a great topic! -Krylar P.S. you have to use the lower-case "p" in ------------------ |
||||
Imsold4christ Member Posts: 305 From: Gresham, OR, US Registered: 01-20-2001 |
Hey, I know this one (and yes, I do still exist, did anyone miss me? ). Christians who follow the Sabbath are doing so because they want to honor God, but Christians who believe it is fine to work every day also want to honor God. Also, Jesus actually broke the Sabbath many times (See Matt 12:1-14, Luke 13:10-17, Luke 14:1-6, and some others). They key is to follow the spirit of the law rather than the letter of the law. Jesus followed the spirit of the law, rather than the letter of the law, as the pharisees did. It was more important for Jesus to heal those people than to follow the Sabbath. †Caleb† ------------------ |
||||
rowanseymour Member Posts: 284 From: Belfast, Northern Ireland Registered: 02-10-2001 |
So you don't think there is a difference between healing on the Sabbath and working on the Sabbath ? ------------------ |
||||
Gift Member Posts: 85 From: Palatine, IL, USA Registered: 02-11-2001 |
One of the few laws about the sabath in the OT is to not light a fire. But all the SDA's I know drive their car to church. A car running at a few thousand rpm would be lighting hundreds or thousands of fires per min. The SDA's responce would be "I have to go to church". Again the preists worked on the sabath and even lit fires for the burnt offerings. But like the sabatairians say "The sabath is a blessing". I think that the biggest problem is when somebody would think that their justification would come from doing the law. Gal 5 "You have to keep the whole law..." Justification comes by faith, obedience to the "law of Christ" comes through God's change He makes in our hearts. To denigh this would denigh the actual spiritual meaning of the Sabath. Love in Christ |
||||
Krylar Administrator Posts: 502 From: MD, USA Registered: 03-05-2001 |
Sabbath stuff: The law has been nuked, but it is still a commandment to not work on the Sabbath day. Actually, it's interesting because the Sabbath is not just something that popped up in the law. It started back in the creation.
...then after the Jews were freed (Moses vs. Pharoah) and they kept on doing all the wrong things. God gave the commandments, which re-iterated the Sabbath in commandment #4:
Note that vs. 11 is a recount of Genesis 2:2. Then the LAW describes all of the specifics of what to do on that day. The commandment says "don't work". The law gets into a bunch of facets. Then Jesus, who is the Lord of the Sabbath, breaks the LAW of the Sabbath by "working". He, of course, defends this by bringing in the point of:
...note that although Jesus is getting food and such on the Sabbath, he still acknowledges the Sabbath and even sets himself as the Lord of the Sabbath. He in no way nukes the Sabbath day. Then we have Paul talking about how we should not disregard the Sabbath.
This text is interesting for a couple of reasons: 1) Vs. 6 points that the Sabbath *may* have been changed from a literal 7th day to a day called "Today". However, it's not specific enough to make that point...at least not to me. 2) Vs. 9-11 again points back to Genesis 2:2, tells us the day still exists, and that we should make every effort to keep it. It also further drives home the point by stating that by not keeping it we can lead our brothers to fall. ...so where does this leave us? Well, my opinion is that the full LAW was nailed to the cross...but the commandments still stand. So if we go around telling people what they have to do on the Sabbath, we're subscribing to the LAW (even if it's our own law). If we don't keep the Sabbath we are breaking a commandment, thus being disobedient. This is no different than lying or stealing or from breaking any other commandment. While it's not a salvation issue, it's still a disobedience issue. Does it nuke you from getting into Heaven? No. Does it injure your relationship with the Father? I believe it does...just as much as lying, stealing, etc. Well, that's my $.02 -Krylar ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Well, now that the law has been nuked, I'm going to kill a few people, and trash this site. Since there is no law I am doing no wrong. (he he he). The question I ask is why we nearly all Christians keep only 9 of the 10 commandments. God must have made a mistake with the fourth one hey? But then he begins it with "REMEMBER" the Sabbath day. He must have known we would forget it, or do it on another day. But hey, if the 10 commandments don't matter anymore, then I'm not a sinner and God doesn't even have to save me... Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
PS. I know I deliberately quoted you out of context Krylar. I'm just in a stirring mood this morning. I may get back to answering some of your points later on - though I'm sure you have heard it all before. ------------------ |
||||
Krylar Administrator Posts: 502 From: MD, USA Registered: 03-05-2001 |
Heya...hehehe... Note to everyone that I'm saying the LAW was nailed to the cross, not the Commandments Sorry if I was confusing on that point. -Krylar ------------------ |
||||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
sabbath... there is so many scriptures on this, and could write a book... i'll put some scriptures in, and others i'll just talk about and if you want i can get the references later. first a few things about the scripture.. some points of what i believe the sabbath was begun at eden. (same as clean, unclean, noah, before man ate the sabbath is twofold - it shows our moral duty to worship our creator sunday is not the new sabbath.. there is no scriptural basis for that, and sunday worship is NOT the mark of the beast.. in the old testament at least God takes his sabbath very very seriously, and many of the prophets point this out.. yet they also point out that God doesn't want our sacrifices by our hearts and even isiah 58 seems to show that its more about the attitude than the legalism of "keeping" the sabbath. the sabbath is mentioned in prophecy yet to be fufilled.. the new testament mentions little about what we should do with the sabbath - thus the heated arguments and controversy.. now that i've briefly specified my background on beliefs on this let me continue: the main focus of my understanding of this is based on the fact that Jesus came not to abolish the law but to fufill it. of the jewish customs this is all the holy spirit wanted to 'burden' christians with.. the sabbath is absent.. is this because the early christians, though they may have rested on this day, (and of course paul went to synagogues to preach oon this day, mostly because that's when he'd have an audience) they understood that the sabbath was fufilled in Christ? in romans 14 below paul says that if oe many considers a day more sacred than other (sabbath) or whatever let him, but don't condumn him for it. and visa versa.. for we all are called to pray constantly and to worship God always.. romans 14 says however to make allowances for fellow christians who are weak in the faith, and aren't so secure outside of some of their traditions and rituals. we need to not to embrace legalism as some do... yet often we can let the baby out with the bathwater.. find the truths there is much more i could say.. maybe i'll write an article and not be so vague and all over the place.. let me end on these scriptures galatians 3:2 gatians 5 :1-2 with my love Karl ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
My turn again. I am an SDA (Seventh-day Adventist), and I have appreciated all the comments made in this post. I apologize on behalf of my church members if any of you got the impression that SDA's believe that we need to keep the Saturday Sabbath to earn our way to heaven. We don't believe that. Salvation is by faith and faith alone. Jesus' gift of eternal life is the only reason that I will get to heaven. That and nothing else. So why do I keep the Sabbath? 1. It was instituted before the fall (in the garden of eden). Because the Sabbath was instituted at Creation, we cannot put it in the same classification of laws that Jesus would fulfil, as the ceremonial laws in Leviticus. Therefor, the Sabbath has not changed and is still just as important as when it was instituted. 2. The Sabbath is the Fourth Commandment. (It is one of the 10) Some people have put the Sabbath in the same classification as circumcision. Circumcision has been done away with in the New Testament, and they say so has the Sabbath. There are a few problems though. The Sabbath is one of the 10 commandments, and the circumcision was not. And if you read the letters in the New Testament, you see many mentions of cirumcision (ie Colossians). Many people were upset that Paul said it was not needed anymore. Imagine if the Sabbath had been done away with. Can you imagine what the Jewish Christians would have had to say about that??? If the Sabbath had been done away with WHY IS THERE NO MENTION OF OBJECTIONS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!!!! - it is because there was no question that the Sabbath was God's day for worship. - for Jews and Gentiles alike. Karl mentioned we need to keep the Sabbath in the spirit of the law, not the letter. But this then means it is even harder to keep.
a. All I have to do to say I am married is to have a piece of paper that But - does that mean it is a happy marriage, or a happy relationship with Jesus. To have a happy marriage, you need to: not lie, not steal, don't commit adultery, don't murder her (he he), and don't lust after other things. To have a happy relationship with God, you need to: not lie, not steal, don't commit adultery, don't murder, don't covet, keep God at number one, don't make idols, don't misuse God's name, AND SPEND TIME WITH HIM. And since God knows when it is best to spend time with Him, I chose the time God put aside, rather than one I choose. That does not mean for the other 6 days I forget God, not at all! I need God everyday and worship and pray to him everyday. But the Sabbath is a special day where I totally concentrate on Him. God's 10 commandments are a guide on how to have a happy relationship with Him. If you notice, the first four define your relationship with God, and the last six with other people. So that is my two cents worth (he he), and from my own personal experience. I don't do it to feel superior to other Christians, I do it because I believe that God knows what is best for my relationship with Him. Revelator!
The whole issue in the book of Revelation is about worship, and Jesus being the conquerer. Revelation 13 is a chapter about worshipping the Beast (Rev 13:8,12). Those who have the mark, worship the Beast. How do you tell the difference between those who worship God and those who worship the Beast? Especially when Satan will come as an Angel of Light (2 Cor 11:14) and will deceive even the the elect - if it were possible. (Matt 24:24). If I was Satan, I would to pretend to be Christ, say that "I" had changed the Sabbath to Sunday and get everyone to worship me. OK. I know this is controversial and will stir up a lot or replies. Rather than attack my questions and comments (though I'm sure you will and I deserve it): ------------------ |
||||
rowanseymour Member Posts: 284 From: Belfast, Northern Ireland Registered: 02-10-2001 |
...hence the danger of trying to fit the ALL imagery in Revelations to things we have already seen. Why do people require signs so badly ? Revelation 13 Am I right to presume you are still able to buy and sell ? Why if I call on God's name on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday do you say I am worshipping God, and if I call on His holy name on Sunday I am actually worshipping satan ? And what part of singing about the glory of God, asking for my sins to be placed upon the cross, rebuking the evil one himself and striving to do His will is worshipping satan ? Colossians 2 ------------------ [This message has been edited by rowanseymour (edited April 20, 2002).] |
||||
Imsold4christ Member Posts: 305 From: Gresham, OR, US Registered: 01-20-2001 |
Okay, I'm just going to shut up now. You guys do a better job at this than me. I just don't have the time to participate in discussions anymore... †Caleb† ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Let's look at Colossians 2 first in the Amplified version: Col 2:13 When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, In Verse 14, that which was nailed to the cross was not the law, but the debt we need to pay for breaking the law. As Christians, when we believe and accept Jesus' gift of Salvation, the consequences of our sins - ie death - was nailed to the cross with Jesus, for Jesus took our death and died it for us, so that we can have his life. In Verse 16, it is not talking about "THE" Sabbath day, but "A" Sabbath Day. The context is talking about ceremonial laws, and there were many Sabbaths in the Jewish Calender year which were part of the yearly feasts and were "High" Sabbaths. These were a shadow that were fulfilled by Christ, not the weekly Sabbath. And looking at it from a logical point of view: Jesus had "two" choices he could do to save us. THE FACT THAT JESUS HAD TO DIE FOR US SO THAT THE LAW WOULD BE FULFILLED, DEMONSTRATES WHAT GOD THINKS OF THE LAW. The Bible gives us absolutely no justification to say that only nine The only one who has the authority to change the 10 commandments is the one who gave them - Jesus. Jesus gave no indication of changing the law, in fact so much of the gospels is focused on "HOW" to observe the Sabbath Day - as a day that should be a blessing for humanity. In fact, it is interesting that the change of the Sabbath to Sunday is prophecied in the Book of Daniel - Dan 7:25, where the little horn power "thinks" to change times and laws. There is only one religion that has changed the 10 commandments like that. They deleted the second command (The one where you can't worship idols), the divided the 10th command into two commands (so they still have a total of 10 commandments), and they claim to be the ones who had the authority to change the Saturday Sabbath to Sunday. It is all documented in the Catholic church - just check out the Catholic catechism. And believe me, I am not making Daniel say what I want it to say. Many of the great reformers including Martin Luther identified the little horn and beast power as the Roman Catholic Church. Now let me EMPHASIZE here that I love the Catholic people, and have friends among them. It is the institution that has set itself up against God. What I find astounding is that many Christians "know" that the Sabbath is Saturday, but they choose not to worship on that day because it is not convenient, and it is going against the "grain" and their tradition. Why not do what God wants? I am not saying that you need to be a Seventh-day Adventist. Any church can choose to change their day of worship from Sunday to Saturday. If you want to follow God and His word as closely as possible, then their is only one choice - Do it on God's day!
I will just put this comment in: (look at Exodus 20:3-17) If you take away the fourth commandment, and only look at the other 9 - then these could be the commandments of Satan himself (or anyone else) Why? Only the fourth commandment about the Sabbath, identifies who is the giver of these commands - the God who created the world and us. The other nine don't. Something to think about (he he). Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
c h i e f y Member Posts: 415 From: Surrey, United Kingdom Registered: 03-07-2002 |
hey I'mSOLD >Also, Jesus actually broke the Sabbath many times (See Matt 12:1-14, Luke 13:10-17, Luke 14:1-6, >and some others). They key is to follow the spirit of the law rather than the letter of the law. Jesus >followed the spirit of the law, rather than the letter of the law, as the pharisees did. It was more >important for Jesus to heal those people than to follow the Sabbath. you had a good contribution to make on this thread, don't say you don't have time or other people can deal with this better than you your comments are equally valid and welcome, come back soon m8! honest revelator : ident post time, you got the opposing view The Bible gives us absolutely no justification to say that only nine who's right? ------------------ [This message has been edited by c h i e f y (edited April 21, 2002).] |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Jesus did not break the moral code (10 commandments), what he did was break the traditions of the Pharisees. You see, after the Jews came back from captivity of Babylon, they decided that they never wanted to break God's laws again. So they decided that they would make a whole list to interprete what it meant not to break the Sabbath. This was not biblical, it was something that they themselves made up. So, they said you can't carry anything on the Sabbath which would be interpreted as work. One of their rules was you could not carry a hankerchief in your pocket on Sabbath, because that was carrying a burden. But if you pinned it on your shirt, then you could because then it was part of your outfit. That is how ridiculous their little laws became, and of coarse Jesus broke them. Jesus said in Mark 7: 8 You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men." Jesus broke their traditions, but no where can you find Jesus breaking the moral Law. And Jesus does not want us to keep the Sabbath like the Pharisees did. He wants it to be a blessing for mankind. A day of rest, (not buying and selling in order to make money), but helping others and sharing God's salvation. Personally I love the Sabbath, because it is a day I don't have to work. I don't have to feel guilty if my boss asks me to work on Saturday. It is a non negotiable, because I am going to spend time with the Creator of the Universe on His special day. It is so beautiful, but I suppose it is something you need to experience to fully appreciate. Anyway... Now I got to go to work, but I am looking forward to my next Sabbath. Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
there is no where in scripture that singles out the ten commandments from the total of the mosaic law.. it is one and all, the ten commandments a divne summary , but one and all.. and the things many of the sabbath laws Jesus broke weren't just pharisee traditions but actually things forbidden in the law (law = torah).. and the the writer of the gospel (need to the find the scripture later - i think john), didn't say that "the pharisees accused jesus of breaking the sabbath" in this case, but actually declared emphatically that Jesus did break the sabbath.. matthew 5:17 Jesus is the fufillment of the sabbath.. as for the law being nailed on the cross, it is true, and not just that scripture.. but its a major themes of romans and other pauline books.. God Bless, Make the Will of the Lord Jesus Christ be accomplished in its entirity.. may the Holy SPirit cinvict us all of sin, and lead us into righteousness.. Karl ------------------ |
||||
Papillon Member Posts: 31 From: Registered: 04-22-2002 |
I would like to point out Romans 14:1-8 1Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters. 2One man's faith allows him to eat everything, but another man, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. 3The man who eats everything must not look down on him who does not, and the man who does not eat everything must not condemn the man who does, for God has accepted him. 4Who are you to judge someone else's servant? To his own master he stands or falls. And he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand. Note particularly verse 5 about not looking down on someone if they regard/don't regard one day as more special than another. |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Don't worry Karl, I don't see this as an Adventist bashing session. I am an Adventist because I believe they follow the Bible the closest. If you can show me otherwise from scripture... I need this discussion, because I need to understand how you understand the gospel. Because. If the law was nailed to the cross: Does that mean it exists no more? If it exists no more, then sin does not exist anymore. For if there is no law, then there is no sin, then I don't need Jesus.
But the New Testament says the Commandments still stand. As it says in James: Verse 11 refers to 2 of the 10 commandments, and James says if you break them you sin, therefore the law still stands.
Did Jesus fulfil the law "Thou shalt not commit adultery", so that now we can sleep with anyone other than our wife (or husband). You cannot just single out one command, and not the others. That is being inconsistent.
Marriage is a law, just as the Sabbath is. That Sabbath is a sign of our relationship with God. Marriage is a sign of our relationship with our spouse. So if the Sabbath does not exist anymore, then maybe marriage doesn't either.... (I'm just trying to show you that you must be consistent. You cannot single out the Sabbath from the other 9 commands. What you say about one, is applicable to the others.)
But God gave us the law to protect and enhance our relationship with God and humanity, and part of the law is the fourth command - the Sabbath.
Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Welcome aboard Papillon. Thanks for your input. You quote from Romans: 14:6, He who regards one day as special, does so to the Lord. He who eats meat, eats to the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who abstains, does so to the Lord and gives thanks to God. Here it does not mention the Sabbath, but just a "day". We must remember that many Jews kept the special days of the feasts in the Old Testament that were fulfilled by Christ. This is what Paul was referring to. In the book of Acts we see Paul keeping the Sabbath. And even where there was no synagogue, he kept the Sabbath (Acts 16:13). For one of the 10 Commandments to have been changed, there would have needed to be a specific text in the New Testament for that to happen. There is no such text because it was not changed during the New Testament days. It only happened later in the first and second century when the Christians did not want to identify with the Jews - who were being persecuted. They justified it by saying they are now worshiping on the day of the Resurrection. Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
revelator, sincely i will reply.. but these days my time is so limited i am not doing many of the things i wish to... for that scripture you asked it is john 5:18.. in the context he had just healed a man and told him to pick up and carry his mat.. (which is forbidden in the law, not just a pharisee tradition.) "For this reason the Jews tried all the harder to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God." it wasn't in the context of the jews accusing him or thinking ... but something that the writer of john opening acknowledged and declared to be a fact, that Jesus was indeed breaking the Sabbath and calling God his own Father making himself equal with God - which He is.. a closer study of the greek grammatical tense will also back this up. Karl ------------------ |
||||
Papillon Member Posts: 31 From: Registered: 04-22-2002 |
Also take a look at Mark 2:23-28
Note especially Jesus' justification in verse 26 -- although what David did was against the Law, this passage seems to indicate it wasn't sinful. As is mentioned in Romans 3:20 20Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin. The purpose of the law then, is to convict people of their sin. If you could follow the law, you would be judged righteous (Romans 2:13); however it is impossible to follow the Law, so we are convicted of our sin (Romans 3:20). This leads us to Christ, who, by living a life free of sin and dying on the cross, has taken our sins upon himself, so we might be judged righteous before God. (Romans 3:21-31) My interpretation then (and I would try to back it up if I had more time), is that the law was created to clearly show us we were sinners. Once we have accepted Christ, the Law has already accomplished its function, leading us to faith in Christ. However, having become like slaves to Christ, we must not follow our sinful nature, but follow the example of Christ's righteousness, through the power of the Holy Spirit. (more to follow, maybe) |
||||
MeanManInOz Member Posts: 388 From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Registered: 06-26-2001 |
Hi again, everyone. What an interesting discussion..... The principle thing that needs to be understood about the sabbath is that it was 'made for man, and not man for the sabbath'. The Sabbath was a gift to us, not a burden. It was about taking a rest and looking towards God instead of earthly things, it was not meant to be about legalism. The 10 commandments overall are just a part of the law, and the Bible says that if you want to keep one part you must keep it all. Anyone who does not have someone who can claim by pure blood to be a priest in the OT sense sacrificing animals on their behalf should give up on the 10 commandments. Instead we must recognise that the law was a shadow of things to come, Jesus living a perfect life fulfilled the Law and made a way for us to enter into salvation which the Law never could, not because it was corrupt, but because we are. The very nature of a list of commandments leads to legalism and thinking of salvation as something that is achieved via a checklist. The Sabbath specifically was a type or picture of salvation, in the NT people recieve the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, and enter into Gods rest on a present continuous basis. The new fulfills the old, and improves on it. The question of Jesus fulfilling the law meaning we don't have to obey it misses the point entirely - when we recieve the Holy Spirit, the law is no longer an external thing, but it is written on our hearts. We do what is right because we want to serve God, not because He has given us a list to check off, then we can go do our own thing. Again, the NT way is better. |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Hi Karl and others. You say that John 5:18 says that Jesus broke the Sabbath. It does say that, but it is from the Pharisee's point of view. Why? Because if Jesus really broke the Sabbath, one of God's 10 commandments, then Jesus has failed as our Saviour. Jesus needed to keep the law 100% and not sin to be our Saviour. Hebrews 4:15 says: "For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are--yet was without sin." The definition of sin is breaking the Commandments (1 John 3:4). So Jesus could not have broken the Sabbath. You also say that "carrying a mat" on the Sabbath is breaking the law. Please show me the text in the old Testament that says that. Rather it was one of the laws that the Pharisees made up. I totally agree with your next post when you say that the law makes us aware of sin and our need for a Saviour. For you can't be made righteous by the law. But I disagree with your conclusion. When you accept Jesus as your Saviour, the law is not irrelevant anymore. It still is there to protect our relationship with Christ. Romans 6:15 says "What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? By no means!" Now you are a Christian you can lie whenever you want? By no means! Why? Because Jesus morals are based on the 10 commandments. In fact Jesus says in John 14:15 - "If ye love me, keep my commandments." The closer you get to Jesus, the less you want to do what is wrong (ie, break the commandments). Jesus asks us to keep the Commandments, and never says that the Sabbath does no longer need to be kept. If you want to follow Jesus, the conclusion is obvious.
I have never seen the 10 Commandments as a checklist to fulfill. I have never obeyed the commands to earn my way into Salvation. In fact, I don't even "try" to keep the commandments, because the love I have for Jesus motivates me to keep them. Because I love my wife, I don't need to continually think - "I must not lie to her, I must not commit adultery etc". Because I love her, I want to spend special time with her, just as I love Jesus and want to spend the special time of the Sabbath with Him. Because I love her, I want to fulfill these laws that enhance our relationship. So it is with the 10 commandments. What I find fascinating is that with the other 9 Commandments people have no problem with. But when it comes to the fourth - they shout out 'Legalism'. When you as a Christian decide not to lie anymore - are you a legalist? Every relationship has a laws to base it on to work. I ask you, what are the rules of your relationship with God? And please don't say love. Love is a very broad term that must be defined. ie. I love God so much that I will make an idol so I can worship Him in a more personal way. Christians disagree with this because the second command says not to make idols. In fact, when Jesus is asked which is the greatest law, In Matthew 22 He says: 37 Jesus replied: "'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' The first four commands define how we love God (including on what special day to worship God) The last 6 commandments define how we love our neighbor. So in conclusion, the basis of our relationship with Jesus is the 10 commandments, and we have no proof in scripture to suggest that the Sabbath has been modified to another day, or does not exist for Christians anymore, or is now applicable everyday. Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
Papillon Member Posts: 31 From: Registered: 04-22-2002 |
It isn't legalistic to observe a day of rest to remember God -- what is legalistic is to insist that that day MUST be Saturday. The calender has changed several times since Exodus 20 was written anyways, so I wouldn't mind betting that the modern Saturday is on a completely different day than the ancient Sabbath anyways. | ||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Thanks for your input Papillon. If it is legalistic to insist that the Sabbath is Saturday, then Jesus is a legalist, all the apostles are legalists. It isn't legalistic to accept the guidelines that God has given to us. It is legalistic if you think that by keeping them you earn your way to heaven though. I would turn your statement around and say it is presumptious and dangerous of you to determine your own day of worship without there being an direction from the Bible saying that it is fine. If you can change one law without any direction from the Bible, then what is there stopping you changing the other laws as you feel like it. Let us start making idols of God and worshipping them. Lets start lying etc... I think you can see where this can end up when humanity follows its own reasons and logic. As for the Saturday being the same that Jesus worshipped on, you can bet on that. The Calander only changed once around the 15 hundreds, when the year was shortened by about 15 days (I am going by memory here). But the sequence of days did not change. Likewise, the Jews can testify that they have strictly marked each Sabbath through the millenia. And Easter shows which is the Sabbath day. Look at Scripture, and you will see that Good Friday is when Jesus was nailed to the cross. Everyone rested on Sabbath while Jesus was in the tomb, and it is on Easter Sunday that Jesus rose from the dead. There is absolutely no doubt that the sequence of days have changed. Why not worship on the Saturday? Should inconvenience stop us from following God to the fullest? If you want your relationship with Jesus to go to the max, then follow the Bible. Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
i have much to say revelator but no time.. but i must agree with you that saturday/sabbath is still the same as it was.. and that sunday doesn't replace sabbath but for most christians sunday isn't sacred to them, its just a day... every day is a day of worship , sunday just happens to be of the days they happen to meet togeather.. i go to church on a sunday, but also on a tuesday,.... others i know who work on sunday go to church on a wednesday... its not a matter of your day versus our day.. anyhow be blessed, and i do bless you on this coming sabbath, as if we do delight in our Lord on the sabbath (rather than just going through the motions of making sure its kept correctly, and checking the sunset calender to make sure we start observing it on the minute of the days sundown for our specific longitude and latitude) , but delight yourself in our Lord our saviour and enter into spiritual rest in Christ as well as have a refreshing and renewing physical rest.. take care all ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
God Bless you Karl! Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
rowanseymour Member Posts: 284 From: Belfast, Northern Ireland Registered: 02-10-2001 |
This may seem a little off topic - but fundamental to my relationship with God is my belief that a non-believer who has never heard the law will receive fair judgement from God (Romans 2), and that a non-believer on a deserted island can pick up a bible and become a christian without ceremonies, historical knowledge about the bible or even a church! If you are convinced in you own mind that the Sabbath is a Saturday, and thus you make it your day of worship, then good for you ! (my understanding of Romans 14) But who are you to say that someone worshipping on a Sunday is worshipping satan ??? I don't drink alcohol because I think the bible says I can't (which it doesn't - but I guess that's a whole other argument ) but because its my small dedication to God ! It makes me happy to do such for the Lord ! So I understand the happiness you feel when you strive to keep God's commandments - but who are we to judge others for not keeping to the laws we make for ourselves - I hope I never make anyone feel guilty for drinking The Mosaic Law was God's covenant with the Israelites, not with you - if you are going to adopt it as your own then you had better start sacrificing some animals. God didn't give the Israelites laws like not eating pork just to test them, but for their own good - eating pork in the desert is a good way to get sick. May I ask what your understanding of this passage is ?
(btw its taken me sooo many edits to get that scripture looking right - this UBB stuff is weird) Notice Paul is condoning eating ALL meats and food sacrificed to idols May God's praises be sung every day of the year for eternity !! God Bless you ------------------ [This message has been edited by rowanseymour (edited April 29, 2002).] |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Hi Rowan. Regarding your quote of 1 Corinthians 10, I agree with you that you can eat anything. (Though your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, so it is important to us to feed it with good food and not destroy it with poison). Not eating pork because it is unclean is something that the Adventist church needs to re-think, because like you - I have discovered ample evidence in the new testament to show that those ceremonial laws have been done away with. By the way, I don't drink alcohol either because I believe the principle in scripture is not to get drunk and out of control. But if my drinking makes other people guilty - great! The Holy Spirit uses guilt in a person to help them change. A person who never has guilt is beyond the help of the Holy Spirit. I'll get back to you on the other points that your post brings up. - got to go to work now. God Bless ------------------ |
||||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
Holy Spirit uses conviction and then hope in CHrist.. guilt is but a tool of the devil to keep you from God's grace. b.t.w what do you think of the investigative judgement, and EGW? ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Hi Karl. I think you would be hard pressed to define a major difference between the "guilt" we feel and the "conviction" that the Holy Spirit gives us. Guilt is what we feel when we have done something wrong. Granted - there are such things as false guilt, but without guilt the Holy Spirit cannot convict us to change. Well, that's my definition anyway. By the way, I am enjoying this discussion, because it is challenging me on some issues I do need to think more about.
As for my foundational beliefs, they are based on the Bible, not Ellen White. Adventists in the past (and still sometimes at the moment) have made a mistake of making her a infallible prophet. She never even said she was a prophet herself, and she always told people to go to the Bible, because it is more important than the Bible. Hope this makes sensse As for the investigative judgement, I'll comment a bit later on. Have to drop my wife off to work. Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
I'm Back again Karl, and have a few minutes on the Investigative Judgement. The two questions people have concerning the investigative judgement is: 1. Is there an investigative judgement I won't go into the Bible texts because I only have a few minutes. But logically I must say there has to be some form of investigative judgement before the second coming of Christ. Why? Note: The logic below assumes that when a person dies, he does not go straight to heaven or hell, but waits in the earth until the second coming of Christ. (I could show you all of this in a separate study) 1. When sin came to the universe it disrupted eternity. Humans will get a chance to survey all of God's decisions during the Millenium. Regarding the starting date of 1844, to me the best explanation for Daniel 8:14 "Sanctuary shall be cleansed" is the investigative judgement. This conclusion is made by looking at what happened on the day of atonement in the earthly sanctuary described in Leviticus. But I believe the date 1844 stands as the end of the 2300 day prophecy from Dan 8:14. The reason is that in Daniel 9 we have the prophecy of Christ coming to this earth. The 70 week prophecy (490 years) starts in 457 BC and concludes in AD 27 when Jesus was annointed with the Holy Spirit at His baptism. In Daniel 9, this prophecy is "cut off" from the 2300 year prophecy. In other words, the 2300 day prophecy also starts in 457 BC and concludes in 1844 AD. That's just a brief answer for you. I would like to know your views. Must go to work. ------------------ |
||||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
i agree in the grand scheme "great contriversy side of it" however i don't agreed that an ongoing invesitgative judgement on individual men began in 1844.. God is fair judge, he isn't gestapo.. to me the Ivestigative judgement is just a cover up for the disspointment of 1844 when Jesus didn't come back.. its source is human pride, not wanting to be humbled and repent, but rather explain it away.. i believe the doctine is quite cultic, encourages legalism to the max.. Jesus doesn't need to go and cleanse the sancuriry.. it all ended on calvary when he cried out "it is finished/accomplished"
b.t.w i've read most of EGW and i believe that like many she had a call of God on her life, and walked in it in part, however i believe she walked in her own flesh also and there is much that goes against the bible.. also the fact that the adventist statement of beliefs include believing in the "spirit of prophesy" and linking that reference in the bible of the spirit of prophesy to her books.. God revealed some truths to the early adventists, but as with all religion , man took it into his own hands and adapted it and used it for his own purpose and now the manmade religion stiffles the working on the holy spirit in the church and binds people up keeping them away from the essense of the gospel.. GOd has broken through to people like Mr Ford, and GOd still works in the church, for there are many who sincerely love and follow God, we all have our dotrinal and cultural blindspots because of our backgrounds, both you and me and everybody else.. I believe you are a christian, but i believe that as a whole (including the General Conference and offical writings of the SDA to be severly unhealthy, ), maybe GOd can use you to start a revival in SDA? i love the SDA church, have many friends there, including pastors... ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Thanks for sharing that Karl. With the same material we come to two different conclusions. I wonder what you will do when the USA legislates Sunday as a day of worship? You probably think it will never happen, but when it does, are you going to throw the baby out with the bathwater? Please keep an open mind... God Bless Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
when and if the us and the world in general legistlates sunday as the only day of worship then i'll oppose it... i know that as far as the sabbath is concerned it is saturday and not sunday... i am only against the ritualised cemeremonial method of keeping the sabbath which is legalistic, and the elevation of the sabbath to the 'seal of God' which is replacing the Holy Spirit ,who is God, with the sabbath -a created thing - which is dangerous idolotory.. i cherish the sabbath, but in my conscience i can't be part of SDA, for that would be compromising the gospel as i know it and have accepted it.. i don't work on sabbath, and enjoy the rest, and like to study and spend time with my wife... but i won't keep sundown timecalenders, and make sure that i don't buy and sell... if i want to spend my sabbath horse riding in the woods in the beauty of God's creation enjoying the company of my wife, and giving thanks to God for his amazing creativity and his sustinance of the universe i'll do it , even though i'll have to pay out money... i think that the underlying truths of hte sabbath and God's rest, is a good aspect of SDA, its only the making the sabbath an idol that i detest, just like making ministers as idols in other denominations, and making tounges an idol... us humans are so good at taking the good things of God and worshipping them.. its more subtle these days but the same.. i mean the idols of old were worshiping gold which God made, images of animals God created and gave us... temple prostitutes, God gave us sex, yet we pervert it and worship it wrong.. SDA as a whole has a bent towards idolising the sabbath.. and i would think that a group of people expert in the sabbath would also be expert in knowing how Christ fufilled it and how to rest in Christ and enter into God's rest.. yet i never see that in adventist doctrine sadly. I believe you can turn your back on dangerous and wrongful adventist doctrines without giving up the gift of the sabbath.. i don't know how much you've studied about the plagerism of Ellen G WHite, or the false things she had said.. i remember she prophesied (as in her day other churches were prophesying and preaching that the jews would return to israel and a jewish nation would be reestablished.. she blatently said that that would not happen... many such things that history has proven otherwise... though i do believe that God had a call over her life and moved through her at occassions.. b.t.w what if sunday law never happens? for me i can see it as a possible end times scenario but i know that as a SDA doctrine its nice and neatly packaged to go into the nice little box of SDA doctrine understanding.. everything in SDA makes sense.. everything in a rational box - but God is bigger than that box.. the sunday law thing may or may not become mainstream, but it conveniently ties in with other adventist doctrines if you know what i mean.. what i mean is SDA theologan and literature don't take evidence without a bias.. But i believe that many many many many christians in other denominations know God and have the HOly Spirit living in them and are born again christians... and if in the future sabbath/sunday becomes an issue of such magnitute.. i trust God that his Holy Spirit will lead them into truth, but i don't think that the end times remnant will come out of SDA , (well not unless there is much repentance and revival and mindset changes in SDA), nor will these other christians will join SDA in such a case.. if such a case happened.. the balanced spirit filled christians would likely just embrace the sabbath if you know what i mean... i hope i don't sound too much like SDA bashing.. ------------------ |
||||
Revelator Member Posts: 226 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: 03-22-2001 |
Hi Karl. It is good to see you have an open mind to the future. I suggest you re look into the aspect of Ellen White and plagerism. She wrote in the nineteenth century and then we impose 21st century rules on her. In her time, everyone wrote as she wrote - borrowing from other authors without giving them credit. This sounds wrong and strange to us, but this was normal practice in the nineteenth century. Also, saying 80% of her writing is plagerised is one big grand statement. Here is a conclusion from someone who is not a Christian, but an expert in the field of Plagerism: [begin quote] And of coarse the "Great Controversy" relies on a lot of other sources, because for the most part of the book, it is about Christian history. The question you need to ask is, how did she know only to copy the truth. Look at her book on health. At a time when smoking was good for you, as well as alcohol, blood letting etc. She wrote a book through the guidance of the Holy Spirit which has confounded experts today. Yes, she copied some material from other "health" books of her day. But how did she know what was right or wrong?? The Sabbath is not an idol to us. Granted, we need more of the Spirit in our worship services, but the Sabbath tells me the best way to worship God. Anyway, the most important thing is that we know Christ, and that He knows us. As for prophecy, the future will see who had the correct interpretation. God Bless you Karl. Revelator! ------------------ |
||||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
i haven't really read much anti egw stuff, i've read more of her books than anything against her.. but the things that she plagerised were sometimes things she claimed to be divinely inspired and to actually be from a vision.. as for the Sabbath Being an idol.. i know that maybe to you and some other adventists it is not.. but anyway it is Sabbath, and have a happy Sabbath and a Blessed one, and may you rest fully in this day, and bathe in Christ, abide in HIm and may His glory be made manifest through you and me in greater measure.. Amen.. Karl ------------------ |