Krylar Administrator Posts: 502 From: MD, USA Registered: 03-05-2001 |
Hiya, So I'm reading the Bible this morning and one of the lines that's always troubled me is from Matthew 27:46, which reads:
I've always wrestled with that because I had thoughts that maybe under such duress that Jesus was actually doubting God...and that was a concern. Well, this morning it all got cleared up as I went through Psalms and hit Psalms 22. What a revelation this was for me because it basically describes the crucifixion! Check it out:
He wasn't doubting anything, but rather pointing that what was happening was prophesied! Maybe you all knew this, I dunno...but I sure didn't and I'm very thankful that it was revealed to me today -Krylar ------------------ |
||
Gamesaint Member Posts: 24 From: Alexandria, la USA Registered: 09-27-2001 |
Yes Jesus was just stating a fact at the time. God the Father had indeed turned his back on Jesus. The bible says in 2Corinthians 5:21 "He that had no sin was made to be sin for us, that we might become the very righteousness of God in Christ Jesus." So you see how you are just as righteous as Jesus. Not because of what you did, but because of what God has done for you in Christ Jesus. There is more about the actual crucifixtion of Jesus in the old testament than the New. There are accounts also in Isasiah 53. I love to see someone recieve from God's word. God Bless, GS out. | ||
Mack Administrator Posts: 2779 From: Registered: 01-20-2001 |
I always thought the same thing but I was corrected a few weeks ago when a pastor did a part sermon on it, pretty kick butt stuff. | ||
holy_fire Member Posts: 40 From: Hamilton, Scotland Registered: 08-20-2001 |
The story of the cross is indead the most dramatic thing to ever of happened. Anyone whom thinks they fully understand what happened on the cross are soo wrong. The bible explains that Jesus was fully man and fully God, on the cross we see that the diety of Christ is torn away and asends to heaven leaving Jesus, forsaking him. At that point sin nature is laid upon Jesus, the very nature that was birthed in Satan, is laid upon Jesus, thats why the Christ Deity had to part form him, as God cannot co-habitate with sin. Jesus dies, and its like a three way split, the diety goes to heaven, the body goes to the grave and jesus' spirit goes to hell. There the transformation begins, in the very depths of hell a man is reborn, the sin nature is removed from Jesus and in Hell itself Jesus is born gain the first begotten, forever crushing Satan, ascends, collects his body ( did anyone notice that from then one this disciples are now called his brothers Jesus is my brother !!) a new creation is born, and we too are a new creation. Jesus never doubted God, what you heard was His humanity crying out to the Deity that had left him God bless |
||
Briant Member Posts: 742 From: Stony Plain, Alberta, Canada Registered: 01-20-2001 |
Hi holy_fire, The idea that Christ's diety left him before he died doesn't sit well with me. I can't put my finger on what exactly is wrong, so I'll have to think about it and reply later. I know that I believe that Christ was still God at his death and that his diety never left him, but I'll have to think about the specific reasons I disagree with you. In any event, I'm not trying to be antagonistic or anything. God bless, |
||
Imsold4christ Member Posts: 305 From: Gresham, OR, US Registered: 01-20-2001 |
I don't think Jesus ever went to hell... I haven't seen any Biblical support for that. †Caleb† ------------------ |
||
Briant Member Posts: 742 From: Stony Plain, Alberta, Canada Registered: 01-20-2001 |
Hi Imsold4christ, > I don't think Jesus ever went to hell... I haven't seen any Biblical support for that. Acts 2:31 says "He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption." Now, the Greek word there translated "hell" in the KJV is Hades, which sometimes means just the grave, sometimes means the entire abode of the righteous + unrighteous (ie. like in the parable of the rich man and lazarus), so "hell" in this verse is kind of vague and open for debate. As well, 1 Pet 3:18-20 talks about Christ preaching to the "spirits in prison", but it is not clear when this took place or what was preached. I think these two verses, and maybe Eph 4:8-9, is where some believe scripture teaches that Christ went to hell. However, *if* Christ did go to hell, I do not believe Christ suffered in hell. Christ did not need to do any more redemptive work after he died, for he said "It is finished" at the moment of his death. God bless, |
||
Freq47 Member Posts: 39 From: Registered: 01-20-2001 |
A verse to contemplate: I think there once was a place called Hades also called Death where the Saints went until Christs Resurection in which the ascended to heaven. This is where I believe Lazarus and Abraham was in Luke 16 _Freq47 [This message has been edited by Freq47 (edited October 13, 2001).] |
||
D-SIPL Moderator Posts: 1345 From: Maesteg, Wales Registered: 07-21-2001 |
Jesus went to hell alright, how else did he get the keys off satan. Jesus died, went to hell, whooped satans butt, came back after 3 days, chilled out with his homies.. and then went to heaven.. jobs a goodin' Well it wasn't quite like that, but you get the picture. -D-SIPL |
||
Imsold4christ Member Posts: 305 From: Gresham, OR, US Registered: 01-20-2001 |
Ephesians 4:9 is talking about Him descending to earth, not to hell. Like Brian said, Acts 2:31 is easily debateable. The NIV (which I believe to be the most reliable translation) calls it "grave" and not "hell". 1 Pet 3:18-20... well, I don't have any explaination for that yet.
quote: I most defenitly have not seen biblical support for that. It sounds to me like it's talking about heaven in Luke 16.
quote: Why would Satan have the keys to hell in the first place? Satan and his demons are not the rulers of hell. You think hell is a place where the demons have a good old time torturing people? Why would God kick them out of heaven into a place where they would have a good time? He wouldn't. The fact is the demons will be in torment along with everyone else. †Caleb† ------------------ |
||
Freq47 Member Posts: 39 From: Registered: 01-20-2001 |
Caleb, do you think that the richman who was in Hell, could see heaven, The bigest tourment of Hell that I know of is that they are totally seperated from GOD. This is why I don't think lazurus or abraham were in Heaven yet. Now when Christ broke the barier of death Hades gave up the saints that were in him. Which we see ascended at that time. Christ also got the keys and posibly locked Hades up. Here most people think that means he unlocked it when he went to the LOWER parts of the earth. Now death or hades is defeated and we don't go there anymore. This place posibly exist in the same state as the Garden of Eden. This is posibly where the idea of purgatory came from. But is no longer valid since Christ defeated Hades and the now the gates of hades shall not prevail. _Brian |
||
Lucas Member Posts: 65 From: Utah, USA (non-Mormon) Registered: 08-02-2001 |
Freq47, I hope that you are not saying that we don't go to Hell. I know what you are talking about, just making sure you do. | ||
Freq47 Member Posts: 39 From: Registered: 01-20-2001 |
I have found something very interesting in 1 pet 3:19. I believe the spirits is prison where the demons that were locked up because to the vileness they spread on earth before the flood. And CHRST was essentially preaching KERUSSO, which is the greek word for preach in this instance. The NASB said proclaiming, and both mean Victory. So it seams that JESUS was essentially saying I HAVE WON to demon spirits. Thoughts? _Freq47 |
||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
That scripture is intepreted quite differently by different scholars and there is no aggreement , and very little other scriptures in the bible to compare its theology to.. so i say that that is a possibility of what you say. many have intepreted that he was preaching to the people who died before him (or before the flood) ... another possibility It doesn't affect the central good news of the gospel of Christ, so i stay clear about building a distinct doctrine on it... What i do know is God is a good God, a Just God and a loving God, and though i don't know all the ways he shows his Godness, justice and love, i can trust that he is just.. i.e from this scripture i'd like to think that jesus made a way for people before he came to be saved.. by accepting him after death.. I could take that and that scripture in acts i think we they baptise people in place of people who have died and build a doctrine however preaching of salvation after death . that is very dangerous and i wouldn't ever consider going that far.. i just know that he is a good God and he got his justice and the way he is dealing with these things under control.. even if i don't understand it.. and i know i could never fit God in the box of my human understanding.. BUt i can trust Him. Karl ------------------ |
||
Owen Member Posts: 22 From: Poulsbo, Wa. US Registered: 01-04-2002 |
There is actually good evidence that Christ was indeed preaching to fallen angels who were made such a mess in the pre-flood days. I would highly recommend if you're interested in some "kick-butt" stuff to check out www.khouse.org But as Chuck Missler says.. don't believe it cause he or anyone else says you but search the scriptures to see that these things be true. If you have a question in scripture.. first praise God and then pray that He'll straighten it out and He will show you. ------------------ |
||
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
yep i'm a chuck and nancy misler fan and listen to their broadcasts regulary.. got most of his series as mp3's interesting stuff. ------------------ |
||
jake Member Posts: 11 From: Registered: 02-18-2002 |
Yikes! I know this is an old thread, but there is a lot of stuff going on here... The "Deity" of Christ? Going to heaven, leaving Jesus behind... Because God cannot co-habitate with sin... Forgive my objection, but as far as the Scriptures I have read (and common sense to go along with it) indicate, Jesus and God are seperate entities. As is the Holy Spirit, for that matter. Throughout the scriptures, God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are given different levels of authority. In fact, there is a scripture that says the Holy Spirit is greater than Jesus (Mathew 12:31). God is the head of Christ (1 Corinthians 11:3). "The Father is greater than I" (John 14:28) God has a name (Jehovah, Yaweh, YHVH, etc..., not just LORD) (Isaiah 43:18). Jesus has a name... But what is the Holy Spirit's name? That's right. It doesn't have one. As far as hell goes, where in the Bible is hell mentioned where the words Sheol or Hades are not the words translated to mean hell? He remained in hell for 3 days, that is, the grave. Also, if Jesus went to the hell that most people think about, why would Job ask to go there (Job 14:3)? And why would hell, or hades, be destroyed in the lake of fire (Revelation 20:14)? About the rich man and Lazarus... That MUST be a parable, or an illustration, because if it were a literal account of hell, then the drop of water would have evaporated! About 1 Peter 3:18-20... Compare Jude 6 and Genesis 6:2-4. The greek word used for spirits is pneumasin and souls is psykhai. So, according with, and in harmony with jude 6, Jesus must've been condemning the spirits that had had relations with the women... Just my take on it all... |
||
MeanManInOz Member Posts: 388 From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Registered: 06-26-2001 |
Wow - most of what you said is excellent. I'm not sure about the last bit, but I'm pleased to meet someone who realises that Jesus spoke in parables. :-) I'll just add a bit here... About 1 Peter 3:18-20... Compare Jude 6 and Genesis 6:2-4. The greek word used for spirits is pneumasin and souls is psykhai. So, according with, and in harmony with jude 6, Jesus must've been condemning the spirits that had had relations with the women... 3:18 Because Christ also suffered once for sins, 1:6 You also know that the angels who did not keep within their proper domain but abandoned their own place of residence, he has kept in eternal chains in utter darkness, locked up for the judgment of the great Day. 6:2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of mankind were beautiful. Thus they took wives for themselves from any they chose. Genesis 6 is a reference to Adam's children marrying the children of the people round about. If angels can have sex, why is there no marriage in the next age ? [This message has been edited by MeanManInOz (edited February 18, 2002).] |
||
jake Member Posts: 11 From: Registered: 02-18-2002 |
There is no marriage in the "next age" because of the fact that some people on earth die before their mates do. Then their mates re-marry. So then you would have polygamy if marriage was allowed in the "next age". Make any sense? I'm a believer in the resurrection to a paradise earth, as God originally intended for mankind, so that might clarify my viewpoint a bit. Jake |
||
MeanManInOz Member Posts: 388 From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Registered: 06-26-2001 |
That is the example that Jesus gave, but I would maintain that it is wrong to suggest that spiritual beings have genitals. | ||
Angel Member Posts: 699 From: The Blissful State Of Me? Registered: 05-21-2001 |
I hope we dont have them... I would also prefer that we dont smell so bad. Looking at it this way all the body does is make smelly things and boy does it smell bad! No poty would be nice too. I wander what a perfect body can do anyways. Maybe we will all have no smell at all unless we find a perfume. (I would prefer no perfume eather. It smells even worss then most bodys.) ------------------ |
||
DeaTH Member Posts: 28 From: halletsville Registered: 01-24-2002 |
i want to smell like a BIG strawberrie or like peaches and cream oatmeal |