RNAGENE Junior Member Posts: 8 From: United States Registered: 02-28-2007 |
Is there a PDF version or a text version of the King James Version of the Bible? |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
there's online versions at www.bible.com and you can always get the esword.
4.5 mb text file. crazy. or in pdf format: only 2.5 mb. interesting...
------------------ |
bwoogie Member Posts: 380 From: kansas usa Registered: 03-12-2005 |
audiobible.com for the blind. ... good luck navigating around there. hehe. ------------------ |
goop2 Member Posts: 1059 From: Registered: 06-30-2004 |
Huh? How does a blind person navigate the internet? And also how can they tell what you just said.. I'm quite baffled. ------------------ |
Tonnyx Member Posts: 140 From: Indiana, USA Registered: 08-02-2005 |
There are text readers for computers. It reads to you the selected screen, and the selected part of the screen, tells you where your cursor is, stuff like that. Also, many people make the mistake of assuming that "blind" means totally and completely stone-blind. In fact, most people who are considered "legally blind" have some amount of vision and can see at least shapes, light, etc. I read a really good essay on it once. I can't remember the title or the author offhand, but she is legally blind and had a lot of good stuff to say about it. [addendum: this is also why it's very important for web developers to learn how to structure their page in such a way that blind people can hear it right. Moving <div> tags around in your html won't make a difference visually, but it can really make things difficult for a blind person] ------------------ [This message has been edited by tonnyx (edited March 09, 2007).] |
zookey Member Posts: 1902 From: Great Falls, Montana, USA Registered: 04-28-2002 |
didn't someone put the Bible on PSP once? I would like it if it was the Message version--I love the Message hehe I can read without dealing with the Shakesperian stuff (I know some like it, but for me it is tough and I read and write a lot!!) ------------------ |
goop2 Member Posts: 1059 From: Registered: 06-30-2004 |
NLT works good for me. Some people say that KJV is the only true translation, but thats only because it was the first. Truth is, its the most inaccurate version. Makes me wonder what people are thinking. Probably blinded by religion as many people are.. ------------------ |
HanClinto Administrator Posts: 1828 From: Indiana Registered: 10-11-2004 |
Goop -- you're overcorrecting a bit.
quote: The KJV wasn't the first, nor was it even the second. The KJV didn't come along until around 200 years after Wycliffe made his first English translations. Erasmus didn't even start his Greek-text compilation (the primary source for the KJV translators) until around 100 years after Wycliffe.
quote: If you double-check your sources, I think you'll find that you're wrong on this point too. Even though the KJV is inaccurate in several ways, it is by no means the least accurate, nor is it even close by any metric I'm aware of. It is a good balance between conveying the original meaning ("thought for thought" translation) and also translating the original words ("word for word" translation). Different English translations today vary in their purpose (NASB for instance trying to be very word-for-word, or NIV trying to be more thought-for-thought). Some versions (such as The Message) don't even purport to even try and be "translations" because they don't even use the original Greek/Hebrew for the source, but rather rely chiefly on other translations, and then they paraphrase it (hence why The Message isn't called a "translation" but rather a "paraphrase"). So even though accurate is a word that can mean many things, while I don't hold the KJV to be the only re-inspired English translation and I don't usually use it in my personal study, it is academically still a very good translation, and is often regarded to be one of the better ones for translating the poetry of scripture and keeping a sense of meter and cadence in language. One of the CCN members created a really excellent site summarizing the "KJV-only" debate, maybe someone can resurrect that link, as it could give you a lot of good information on the subject. Edit: Found, the website was made by BrianT. Here's the link. --clint [This message has been edited by HanClinto (edited March 13, 2007).] |
Jari Member Posts: 1471 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: 03-11-2005 |
Since Clint posted that link I thought that link to article from the other perspective should be posted. So Here's link to article that compares KJV to modern translations: http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/defens.htm It has some good points in my opinion like the one's where the very basics (fundemental) of evangelium is changed by leaving out the name of Jesus Christ, from some verses of some translations. The better you know the whole Bible the better you see how the changes break Bible's integrity. I don't want to shock any one but on the other hand you have the right to know and God wants the truth of course. Every word is important. May God bless your study. In Christ,
[VoHW] (Help needed) [Blog] - Truedisciple (mp3) [This message has been edited by jari (edited March 13, 2007).] |
HanClinto Administrator Posts: 1828 From: Indiana Registered: 10-11-2004 |
Hey Jari! Thanks for your post. I really didn't want to start a huge off-topic discussion about KJV-onlyism in this thread, but perhaps that's inevitable now. If people want to keep discussing the idea of King-James-Only, then please start a new thread. Jari, I honestly wasn't trying to slam the KJV -- I was trying to defend it, though without going too overboard in either direction. --clint |
Jari Member Posts: 1471 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: 03-11-2005 |
Yeah I thought so Clint, so no problem. I don't want to talk about this anymore because it seems quite pointless since we have so many articles and every one can read multiple translations online in order to study the differences between translations. ------------------ [VoHW] (Help needed) [Blog] - Truedisciple (mp3) |
dna Junior Member Posts: 3 From: Registered: 02-20-2007 |
Some of the links are dead however, thank you for the reference. Happy Easter |
Faith_Warrior Member Posts: 490 From: So.Cal. Registered: 09-05-2006 |
quote: http://www.ccel.org/ If you are just looking for am electronic version than http://www.crosswire.org/sword/index.jsp Yes, Happy Resurrection day/First Fruits |