Stalks-the-Night Member Posts: 18 From: L'anse, MI Registered: 11-10-2004 |
I just finished a paper on war for college and i just wanted to a hear some opinions about the war that we are in now. |
c h i e f y Member Posts: 415 From: Surrey, United Kingdom Registered: 03-07-2002 |
http://www.iaja.net/rc/rc.html this page says it all just turn UP the volume, that's all ------------------ |
CobraA1 Member Posts: 926 From: MN Registered: 02-19-2001 |
My opinion? It was time to get rid of Saddam. WMDs or no WMDs, I think he was dangerous. Do a Google of "history of saddam" - most articles do not paint a pretty picture of him. ------------------ Switch Mayhem now available! Get it here |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
Watch "Tears of the Sun" and you will see my opinion on the war in Iraq. central quote: basically, I'm agreeing with CobraA1. Saddam had to go and his tyranny needed to end. ------------------ |
bennythebear Member Posts: 1225 From: kentucky,usa Registered: 12-13-2003 |
my question is what does the bible say about war? we don't war against flesh and blood, love them that hate you, bless them that curse you, return good for evil. anyone get where i'm going with this? i don't believe Christians should take military actions, that's what the governments of the WORLD are concerned with. we should be more focused on spreading the gospel and getting people saved. america is just another country in the world, and one day it will cease to exist as the other countries that are currently set up will also cease to exist. there's 2 basic types of people in this world, those who truely know and follow Christ, and those who aren't right with God. i currently live in america and always have, and i do not hate america. but i do not hold it above any other country in this world. my dad served in vietnam, i know people who go through wars go through some crap, but both sides get hit just as hard, and both sides need the same Jesus, america and americans aren't any more rightous, holy, or blessed than any other nation. i believe we're set up like we are so that the Christians here can put blessings("talents" if you think about the parable) to use. i still have growing to do, and i still make more than my share of mistakes, but the truth is the truth. ------------------ www.gfa.org - Gospel for Asia www.persecution.com - Voice of the Martyrs |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
when the Bible says that our war is against spiritual things, not flesh and blood, it means our christian fight. we don't go and attack the heathens because they aren't christian. but I would have to disagree with you on war. one side can be just and right in fighting. ------------------ |
Simon_Templar Member Posts: 330 From: Eau Claire, WI USA Registered: 10-25-2004 |
Here's a brain-bender for you... If your a Christian and someone kills you, that person is doing something which angers God... God says that he will take vengance for his people, He also says when he returns He will "trouble those who have troubled my people". God is very jealous about people that do bad things to his people. So if your a christian and someone kills you its likely to be very very bad for that person. Now, love, biblicaly defined, is to do what is in the best interests of the object loved, despite the cost to yourself. Thus would it be in the best interest of the person to let them kill you, or to stop them from killing you? The basic point here is that death is not the worst thing that can happen to someone. We see it that way only because we look at it through a humanist perspective. The fact is that in the bible God on a few occasions actually killed someone, or hinted that someone would be killed, to prevent them from doing something evil because he loved them and didn't want them to become more corrupted. Just one example of that idea is Jesus said it would be better for a person to have never been born, or to be thrown into the sea with a millstone around their neck than to harm a child or lead a child astray. As for war, the first thing that sticks out in my mind is that no major branch of the christian church has ever believed or taught that war was always wrong. While this isn't 100% proof, it should raise a question about the idea. I don't mean to be attacking or anything in any of this, hopefully it doesn't come across that way I just like blabbing and rambling ------------------ |
bennythebear Member Posts: 1225 From: kentucky,usa Registered: 12-13-2003 |
i know my view isn't the most popular view. i know war happens, but i don't believe Christians should concerned with it, Jesus said not to be. we are not part of this world, that does not mean we shouldn't care that people are getting killed or persecuted. i believe we are to pray and let God deal with them. as for there being wose things than death, there isn't anything worse than that for a lost man, because he's going to be tossed into a lake of fire forever. paul persecuted the church, watched people get stoned, and prob'ly loved every minute of it at the time. now if peter had just happened to pull out his sword(if he had been there) and gut paul(saul at the time) that wouldn't have been a good thing. God gave paul repentence and had a purpose for his life. God does not enjoy the death of the wicked, he enjoys the repentence of the wicked. judgement is Christ's job, not ours. ------------------ www.gfa.org - Gospel for Asia www.persecution.com - Voice of the Martyrs |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
it is the government's job, tho... it's appointed as a "minister of justice." but anyhow... little twist (and something to annoy those who are anti-weaponry): but, benny, I do want you to know that, even tho I disagree, I respect your views. (and not in the way like "oh, I tolerate your views") ------------------ |
bennythebear Member Posts: 1225 From: kentucky,usa Registered: 12-13-2003 |
i understand. the main thing is Christ and Him crucified, and resurrected . i respect your's, and everyone elses too. btw, i could use some prayer from my brothers and sisters(which i think cheybea is the only female on this site ), i'm not really going through a valley, more of trying to get out of a mudpit i made myself, and trying to keep in rememberance that God is faithful to forgive. ------------------ www.gfa.org - Gospel for Asia www.persecution.com - Voice of the Martyrs |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
sure thing man. (I said what I said so you wouldn't feel like it was you against everyone else) ------------------ |
goop2 Member Posts: 1059 From: Registered: 06-30-2004 |
quote: I looked through the site for a while. then I saw the picture of the fireman pointing. I looked behind him and that was enough for me. Nope, not going back to that site anytime soon. That picture was evil man. ------------------ I took the road less traveled and now WHERE THE HELL AM I????? [This message has been edited by goop2 (edited November 14, 2004).] |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
quote: ??? ------------------ |
goop2 Member Posts: 1059 From: Registered: 06-30-2004 |
behind the pointing fireman was a demon or something. It scared the crap outa me ------------------ I took the road less traveled and now WHERE THE HELL AM I????? |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
oh that. haha. didn't see any fireman tho... don't be thcared (scared said with a lisp) ------------------ |
Brandon Member Posts: 594 From: Kansas City, Mo, USA Registered: 02-02-2004 |
quote: That is terribly sad... I do not like war at all... but there is evil in the world, many terrorist cells and strongholds were defeated in Afghanistan and Iraq. I also think that things are opening up for the Gospel to be spread to anyone who will hear. Last year a man came to our Church who had been in one of the Towers. His testimony was incredible. There was a point where he looked out and saw the airplane heading straight towards his office, he told us that he cried to the Lord, and then the plane suddenly tilted as he cried out and the plane missed him by a small margin. You can see this in the video's, watch as the plane is slighty knocked off course by an unseen force just a few milliseconds before impact. This occured at the exact moment when he cried out to the Lord. I am saying this because although war, terror, and all the evils of this world may seem so strong, and so overwhelming, but God is still on the throne and He is in control. Stay in God's Will and no matter what, you won't leave this life until God says so! That's fact. And there isn't a thing that the enemy can do about it. ------------------ [This message has been edited by brandon (edited November 14, 2004).] |
Max Member Posts: 523 From: IA Registered: 09-19-2004 |
I think if people never fought against evil and what is not right, then there really wouldn't be a world right now. What I mean is, if people (christians included) didn't fight Hitler in WWII, or fight against slavery in the civil war, then today most of us wouldn't exist and most people would be either dead or enslaved. I don't think Christians can always just say, "I'm christian, I won't fight against people that will try to bring ruin to everything because we should pray and have God deal with them" That is a little unrealistic. Not all wars are wrong, I think that what we did/are doing in Iraq is for the better. I do believe we should be heading out soon though. Hey Benny, I respect your opinion too. This is not aimed at you, simply my point of you. Well, hopefully this will stir minds, but not harsh feelings. God Bless, ------------------ |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
I agree with you, except on one minor point:quote: the civil war wasn't about slavery, it was about state rights. The emancipation proclamation was a piece of propaganda to make the war apear to be a war on slavery. read it. the emancipation proclamation only frees the slaves in the states fighting the union. ------------------ |
goop2 Member Posts: 1059 From: Registered: 06-30-2004 |
When you listened to that stuff, it wasnt nearly as bad as the thing I found on Glen Becks website. Unfortunatly the next day he created Insider ------------------ I took the road less traveled and now WHERE THE HELL AM I????? |
Max Member Posts: 523 From: IA Registered: 09-19-2004 |
Thank you for correcting me Archangel, my bad. I was sorta being a little too general. Thanks. ------------------ |
Klown Member Posts: 78 From: baraga, mi , united states of america Registered: 11-10-2004 |
Ahh now to a heated topic. The war against Iraq is wrong. What Bush did to Iraq was no better then what Osama did to the USA. Yes I'll admit Sadam is evil and shoulda been taken out of office. But the way it happend was just WRONG!!! We still really didnt finish our job in Afghanistan. We never accomplished our mission to get Osama and eliminate the Al Queda terror network. No matter what Bush says. We failed in that mission and it's all his fault. War in all aspects is wrong. Yet we have to fight wars to stop world destruction from evil's like Osama. Now here is a question to the poster that said quote,"If your a Christian and someone kills you, that person is doing something which angers God... God says that he will take vengance for his people, He also says when he returns He will "trouble those who have troubled my people". God is very jealous about people that do bad things to his people. So if your a christian and someone kills you its likely to be very very bad for that person. Now, love, biblicaly defined, is to do what is in the best interests of the object loved, despite the cost to yourself. Thus would it be in the best interest of the person to let them kill you, or to stop them from killing you? " What if the person at the other end of that scope that kills you and he/she is a christian themselves just fighting for what they feal is right on the other side of the battle? |
HanClinto Administrator Posts: 1828 From: Indiana Registered: 10-11-2004 |
Interesting post Klown -- just a quick reply to a small portion of your post.
quote: The hardest thing I've ever heard about in this regard close to us would be the American civil war. To hear generals from both sides talk about their faith in God really makes you wonder. For a scriptural example (for those of us here who hail from other parts of the globe than America), the one that came to mind would be the wars between Judah and the other tribes, it's just some crazy stuff. It's heart-wrenching stuff, and I don't know an easy answer to it. It's the kind of thing that makes you crumple on the floor and pray. Thanks for your posts -- I hope that we can have good, edifying discussion here. Btw... welcome to the CCN forums!!! I'm fairly new here, though I've really enjoyed it ever since I've arrived. It's good to see you here. In Christ, ------------------ |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
quote: wrong. I don't know where you get your facts, but we were cheered when we entered Iraq. The people even literally welcomed our bombs because it meant there freedom from Saddam. we weren't trying to screw the Iraqs.
quote: we did alot to take down the Al Qaeda network.
quote: war is not in all aspects wrong. you should get off your arrogant high horse and realize what goes on in this world. people need to stand up.
quote: best overall for everyone to stop murder. gee.. that was a hard question...
quote: and? so what? we're not the judge. we have to do what we have to do. somebody is right and somebody is wrong, no matter how strongly each party feels. ------------------ |
Klown Member Posts: 78 From: baraga, mi , united states of america Registered: 11-10-2004 |
Get off my arrogant high horse? I've lost an uncle to war and know alot of pepl who suffered during war. I personally know a person who lived a morter blast and seen his whole platoon and most of another one die in the attack. You can not sit there and tell me war is wrong!! If you can, then i think you need to wake up and step outside and live in the world. I do believe you're condicending yourself chum. You say war is good, yet murder is wrong? Isnt what you're doing in a battle technicaly murder? Ohhh, as for saying Iraqies embraced with open arms. Not tottaly correct. Yes there was a lot of young people and a few of the sects that has been held back and slaughtered by Sadam embracing us. Yet the majority of the population never wanted us to invade. Why do you think you're such a strong militant holding and following in Iraq right now. Bush invaded Iraq with a huge grudge against because Sadam had once put a hit out on his daddies head. There was never any WMD's, No chemical or bio weaps. And in the first Gulf War, the last of the Bio and Chem weaps Sadam used, WE GIVE HIM. Yes, the united States gave Sadam WMD's, Bio and Chemical weapons. During the Iran conflict and when Afg was battling Russia, Carter and Reagan made sure at all cost's Russa would lose the WAR. So we gave them technology and WMD's and Bio and Chemical weapons to make sure they would win the war. After the 6month hostage of Kuwate, did Bush decide to attack Iraq with the approval of the U.N. and not only steam rolled him and let him GO FREE!!! We also made sure he had no more WMD's or chemical or Bio weapons. Heck, we even made sure they didnt have enough tubing or fuel for him to support or even create Skuds for almost a year. |
bennythebear Member Posts: 1225 From: kentucky,usa Registered: 12-13-2003 |
doesn't anyone see the wrong in 2 "Christians" fighting against each other, especially physical warfare, both people would be sinning, and whoever "won" the fight would be a murderer. the commandments of Christ apply to everyone, in every situation. there are things married people can do that single ones can't. there are things pastors and deacons have to do that others don't have to. but murder is murder no matter what the situation is. if you leave it in God's hands it will work out for the best. if He wants them dead it will happen. they might even get born again, and then we have a another brother/sister in Christ. and as far as a kill or be killed situation, if someone's trying to kill me i'm going to assume they're heading toward hell when they die, as for me i'm heading toward heaven, so if i get killed i get eternal rest and i get to spend it with Jesus, if i kill him he's going to an eternal lake of fire, and i ruin my relationship with God. thinking like that, how would it be right for me to kill someone? ------------------ www.gfa.org - Gospel for Asia www.persecution.com - Voice of the Martyrs |
goop2 Member Posts: 1059 From: Registered: 06-30-2004 |
When Im 21 Im going to war and Im gonna be proud of it. Ill be helping to keep America what it should be. Im wondering if your even a christian. You dont seem to sound like one. I was edgy on the first post I saw from you. The thing that gets me the most is your avatar looks like a pentagram.
------------------ I shall worship you all of my life. Till death do us together. |
CobraA1 Member Posts: 926 From: MN Registered: 02-19-2001 |
Time to slow down and think a bit more . . . I myself am not completely sure what my own opinion of war is, but Glen Miller had some interesting notes when comparing Bibical wars to the Quran. God actually gives some guidelines for war in Deuteronomy 20. ------------------ Switch Mayhem now available! Get it here |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
quote: I didn't fully explain my position, so let me put it this way. there are worse things than war. tyranny, genocides, etc. sometimes it is necessary. War isn't always wrong, although it is always terrible. ------------------ |
Klown Member Posts: 78 From: baraga, mi , united states of america Registered: 11-10-2004 |
Thank you for explaining yourself Archangel. Now I can see where you're coming from and understand your point of view. Just like I hope you can see where I'm coming from and my point of view on the aspect. Yes you do bring up a good point Benny. Yet until the mark of the Lord appears on our foreheads for other christians to see. There will be no way to tell if the pepl we're shooting at on the battle is a christian or not. And unfortunatly, there are times when that instance happens. Just one christian fighting for his country who believes they're right and the opposing army feels they're right. Now to Goop2. The pentagram was never a Satanic Symble when it first came out. The symble came from Leonardo Divinci. It was used for the Di Vinci Code formula. If you look at the Divinci Man in the circle, what do you see? The pentagram. A lot of symbles over the years have been jacked and used for other things. Just like Swaztica. The orriginal Swaztica was used for friendly restraunts and pubs. Hitler took the symble and reversed the direction of the bars and used it his for emblem. Might wanna do a lil investigating into certian symbles. And besides, the Heartagram is the emblem for a certian Skate Board company. And besides, I personally think it looks good. ------------------ |
goop2 Member Posts: 1059 From: Registered: 06-30-2004 |
Sorry, Im kinda embarassed to say it, but I got this cold feeling when I saw you... ------------------ I shall worship you all of my life. Till death do us together. |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
quote: yes I do... (yes, in an understanding sort of way...)
quote: The swaztica did predate hitler. I've heard it's also in buddhist temples. saw some indian drawings of it. supposed to mean Indestructible.
quote: to a degree, yes. if you believe that you are God, does that make you a christian? but, I this isn't that case... ------------------ |
Klown Member Posts: 78 From: baraga, mi , united states of america Registered: 11-10-2004 |
I'm baffeled over your last comment Archangel. Because I'm different and a free thinker, a few chosen pepl here on this board flammed me. I just cant get over it. And no where in these post's have I said I was God. I hope this isnt how y'all here chose to welcome free thinking new people here to these boards by flamming and attacking them because they're so called " NEWBIES" or not in the chosen Clique. My views arent gonna be exactly how everyone else is here. My view's represent the hell of a life i've had and the hell i've been through to make it here. I've lived in the innercity ghetto's and seen the worst of mankind. I'm sorry Goop if I some how gave you that cold feelig. Yet to be honest. I have no idea how I did. As I've said, I'm a free thinker and an individual. I may not be a christian as long as you have been but I"m no better of a one then you are. We are all equal in the eyes of our lord. Yet I'm glad that by the things I've said here on the boards so far has brought in a good debate and has made everyone here think and expand their views on a few things. ------------------ |
bennythebear Member Posts: 1225 From: kentucky,usa Registered: 12-13-2003 |
i would just like to clarify that when it comes to the word of God, there is a right and a wrong. things are black and white, gray is just the black sugar coated. opinions, views, thoughts, however you want to word it, are just those. i need scripture shown to me about anything before i even consider changing my mind, because if you can't prove it with the word of God, then you can disprove it with the word of God. i'm not trying to be hateful, but when it comes to the things of God, i am very serious. so whether it be war, abortion, murder, adultery...whatever, just show me the scriptures that your beliefs are based on, and i'll glady listen, and respond. if i'm wrong on anything i want God to open my eyes that i might grow, and so i won't mislead anyone. but until someone shows me in the bible i'm not going to take it to heart. ------------------ www.gfa.org - Gospel for Asia www.persecution.com - Voice of the Martyrs |
CobraA1 Member Posts: 926 From: MN Registered: 02-19-2001 |
quote: Yeah, I was sorta surprised myself at some of the comments - but I don't think they did so because you are different or a "free thinker," I think they did so because you seemed a bit haughty. Unfortunately, they didn't do much better. I'd say both sides are doing pretty horrible with all the mud slinging. And no, this isn't how things usually go - as programmers, we have a tendency to engage in more reasonable thinking and logic (logic is, after all, all a computer understands). This is a bit unusual. [This message has been edited by CobraA1 (edited November 22, 2004).] |
ArchAngel Member Posts: 3450 From: SV, CA, USA Registered: 01-29-2002 |
quote: um... I said that you can't think whatever you want and still consider yourself a part of so and so group. groups must have limiting factors. if not, it's not a group. but, if you read what I said, I said it wasn't the case as in, you didn't say those things... so...
------------------ |
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
as a moderator i better step in thanks for your discussion klown, it does bring up some new and interesting discussion points, some peoples fcomments may have been a little disrespectful, but i think overall they've been tame, but i know how easy the human heart can get offended - as i seem to have one of those myself (a human heart). lets go on some issues for a second before i explain my points and as a christian, on issues such as abortion i think its very clear cut.. for example the right to abort based on being raped - i think its a non issue, as a Christian, for the woman, its a chance for God's grace to be sufficent, despite their suffering, for him to be able to comfort and heal and grow the mother in an amazing way, and be a testimony to many - i've seen this happen and its awesome (though of course its not easy), but it can be an oppurtunity for God to be Glorified through his grace working in the mothers life, though people weren't meant to be fatherless and its not easy - its the sinful world we live in, one which God can use ALL things. Also as christians we can show selfless and supporting love, be part of the village to grow up this child , christian men being Godly male role models. and the fruit of such thing can be amazing.. Sure there will be suffering for the woman (and also the child), but life for everybody is not without suffering, and God can use our suffering for good, and grow us, and restore whaat the locusts have eaten, besides so many women who do ABORt, suffer from depression from that act, and greif and loss that they just can't comprehend, its sad when our society has gone so that because of our thinking, so many women are duped into going against their natural maternal instincts, and women being less violent than men are actually involved in the most amount of murder - utterly bizzare. anyhow Whether they see their child day in and day out, as a reminder of their rape, and rapist, and get down and depressed about that, or rather as a blessing from God, a gift, something good (an amazing child) coming out of something bad (a rape) is a matter of perspective - whether you have God's perspective or the worlds perspective as for say medical complications, lets say an ectopic pregnancy. medical science can not yet make the baby to survive, only the mother, but maybe one day it can, as it can already with 25 or 26 week premy babies being delivered rather young, and with amazing surgery inside the womb even on 12 or 13 week babies, utterly amazing. But even to loose a baby in that way, is still a lose and with grief - like a miscarriage, or like my friends whose baby died at 5 days old. but getting to my point - its about worldview. First of all, NO christian has a 100% Godly worldview, we all have our blind spots, some of them serious and like a cancer, and some on issues that won't really affect our life or spiritual walk in a negative way, and we are also all on a journey with God, and as we abide with him, we get transformed into his image, and thus also have more of his worldview. But I and others who disagree with you have some blindspots definately, but there are certian foundations of the faith that we need to have solid foundations in (so we are on the rock, not on the sand and can be easily washed away), and out of those foundations come certian worldviews. i have found in the past that my interlectual pride, and also not wanting non christian friends and stuff to look down on me "because of closed mindedness" or maybe because i didn't wanted to be associated with some 'backward christian hicks or whatever, have allowed my pride to manifest itself as being a 'free thinker', when in reality, and what shocked me, was alot of my 'free thoughts' were a result of feeding off the world and its secular humanist worldview. It is scary that even the most devout of us christians have part of our blindspots from our culture, and from the world.. Often it shocks me when God reveals this on an issue or not - and it scares me to think that certian worldviews and media and education have unbeknownly to my consious self had such an impact on the way i think.. and from alot of your arguments that thoughts, i can see written all over them secular humanist worldview, which is quite contrary to a biblical worldview? does this mean you are less of a christian? , by no means, none of us here are christians because we are better than one another, or know more of the 'right stuff' etc.. its only by God's grace, and by faith, we are all equal foul sinners, and saved and loved by a merciful God, accepting the free gift of salvation, though we are at different stages in our walks, some of us who may be mature in some areas more, can be severely retarded in our worldview in certian areas, because of cultural blindspots, but even then God's Grace is sufficent for me adn them, and you in that. so in our walk with Christ, as we abide with him, and let him challenge our hearts and our minds, and offer our opinions and every part of us up to him as part of our sacrifice and given him permission to work in them all, our human mind and thinking and foolish 'worldly' wisdom can be replaced by the mind of christ. So i am confident , that as you walk and grow in Christ, your worldview will be challenged and will change in many areas, but in the journey you will learn and experience things of God and his character that you could never get from just the 'factors and arguments' of these issues, but find the characters of God's grace, mercy, and jsutice , longsuffering etc behind, and it is very rich experience. And by the way, even in the wrong beliefs and worldviews are also nuggets of truth, that some more mature christians (who by nature of that sometimes risk being spiritually proud, and then can discount the truth at all in the other things), but for instance, the desire for grace and udnerstanding for women in those situations, is a good thing, even if the good intention is in a dangerou framework, that mercy in your heart is valuable to God and can and will be used by him. God is an unchanging God, with certian paradoxes, its not possitive and negative like eastern yin and yan but perfect complements say JUSTICE and MERCY but back to the issue of worldview well the main answer is abiding and walking with Christ, you become like those you are around (even if you don't want to, for example my wife, though determined not to talk like a kiwi, subconsiously picks up the kiwi accent and starts using kiwi words rather than her american words - even though she tries so hard to never use kiwi words, the kiwi rather than american version just slips off her lips (side issue, and people say ungodly entertainment doesn't have an effect on you - if you are well balanaced - yeah right but anyway) romans 12:2 and take everythought captive to Christ - that's also being willing to laydown our opinions , which takes being secure in our idenity in Christ (so our idenity comes from Christ, rather than from our opinions and thinking that that is what makes us who we are.) Love ------------------ |
Simon_Templar Member Posts: 330 From: Eau Claire, WI USA Registered: 10-25-2004 |
I've pretty much said my piece on the issues, but would like to offer a couple of historical notes on symbols that have been raised, but maybe are a little tangential to the main topic. The Swastika.. the swastika is a very ancient symbol and long predates the Nazi's. The Nazi's based much of their ideology around the existance of the "aryan" race. The idea of this race, as the nazi's imagined it is mostly born of occultism and pure imagination. However, the Nazi's went to great lengths to try and prove their views scientificly. Those lengths included many archeological expeditions and efforst in india and the surrounding region. This is because the Aryan's were a real group of people (they were just nothing resembling what the nazi's wanted them to be) who moved out of the the steppes down into India and Persia thousands of years ago. The Nazi's adopted the swastika as their symbol because they believed that it was a symbol invented by the aryans. The Pentagram.. The Pentagram is easily as old as the swastika, if not older. The first known examples of the pentagram are found in ancient sumerian tablets going back 4000-5000 years old. What the pentagram originaly meant or where it original derived from is pretty much a mystery, although many believe it symbolized the 5 elements of which they believed creation was composed. However, the pentagram has been used by many different people and religions down through history. In early christianity the pentagram was used to symbolize the wounds Jesus suffered while on the cross. It is a little known fact that most of the modern occultism came through victorian age occultism, which in turn was a descendant of medieval occult traditions, and most of them were born out of judaism and christian traditions. The beginning of these traditions was in Jewish Kabbalah, and its christian counter part. Gradualy over time the jewish and christian aspects were diluted by mixture of greek and egyptian beliefs (known as hermeticism) to produce the occult ideas of the middle ages.. from there it was further diluted by removing the jewish and christian aspects and replacing them with eastern philosophies of hiduism, along with a good deal of out right imagination, and that is what produced victorain age occultism, which is the direct parent of what we have now. ------------------ |
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
so wheres my favourite klown gone? huh? ------------------ [This message has been edited by klumsy (edited November 25, 2004).] |
Klumsy Administrator Posts: 1061 From: Port Angeles, WA, USA Registered: 10-25-2001 |
oh klown i'm waiting for you, i know you are there. peek a boo. ------------------ |
Klown Member Posts: 78 From: baraga, mi , united states of america Registered: 11-10-2004 |
Otay. We have the war going on right now in Iraq that is becoming worse then Vietnam ever was. Urban and street fighting. Civilians being killed and taken hostage. And a country with out a real working government. Sadams minnions are running wild and not only taking out the police force's being installed in Iraq, but also taking out leaders that are in place right now. To much human life being lost because of Bush's attack on Iraq for Weapons of Mass Destruction, Chemical and Bio weapons. Yet what did he say the other day? There are no WMD's or Chemical or Bio weaps there and hasnt been any for a few years. Yet he says they could have had them weapons in a few years if Sadam wanted them. Is it me or did Bush prove alot of people right by him saying that? Not only did he just prove that this war was unjust but he's also making the U.S. look like a bully among other nations. All Bush has done is give the US a huge black eye and ruining our foriegn relations. Yet, he's slowly gaining that back by what he's doing with the Red Cross and Tsunami Victims. Now as I've said before. I agree that Sadam had to removed from power along with the idiots who are running the Oil for Food programs over there, but they did it in the worst possible way. I'm hoping that the fighting will slowly die down and Iraq will become it's own government again with out our support. Yet i know that is very far off into teh future. I'm sick of hearing about all the loss of life over there. Specially when I have a few friends over there right now in the National Gaurd. ------------------ |
CobraA1 Member Posts: 926 From: MN Registered: 02-19-2001 |
I'm sure we could talk 'till we're blue in the face on the Iraq issues. Looks like some already have . . . I'll just talk about current events for now, I doubt we'll ever come to a complete agrement about the past of Iraq.
quote: I'm sure Iraq will have its own government with or without our support. They're already having elections.
quote: The election date is set, and it's not that far off. ------------------ Switch Mayhem now available! Get it here |
goop2 Member Posts: 1059 From: Registered: 06-30-2004 |
Americans say that this war is horrible, they dont appreciate the lives that are given in it, but the Iraqis think the war is good. We are standing between Iraq and BLAMO!!! Also, without this war we will never find Bin Lauden and he will only continue to terrorize the world. ------------------ I dont like siggys. They are to hard to think up :( |
GUMP Member Posts: 1335 From: Melbourne, FL USA Registered: 11-09-2002 |
http://www.worldmag.com/subscriber/displayarticle.cfm?id=9762 People make a big deal about the lack of WMD. This disagreement comes about mainly due to a basic difference in how people define "having WMD". To many people, "having WMD" means warehouses filled with war material ready to be used. Of course, the problem with chemical and biological weapons is that even if you have a tiny sample it's possible to quickly grow enough to kill off the world's population in a short amount of time. Basically I see the Pentagon and the CIA as having erred on the side of caution. They had evidence that Saddam was pursuing weapons research programs so they assumed that meant Saddam had managed to resupply his WMD stocks. The evidence the world's intelligence community had for Saddam actually having USABLE weapons was rather flimsy, but from their psychological profiles, as well as interviews with subordinates, of Saddam it was believed he'd pursue WMD mainly for his stature. Saddam apparently felt "belittled" in the eyes of his peers merely if he didn't make the claim of having WMD. From everything I've read it appears UN sanctions were at least capable of slowing the WMD research program's progress due to lack of materials. Saddam had the facilities in place ready to go into production once sanctions were hypothetically lifted. Just the mere fact that Saddam was actively seeking WMD programs was breaking international law, which by itself is legal justification for the Coalition's actions. Now for the links with terrorism. For some odd reason people associate Al Qaeda as BEING Osama Bin Laden. So when news networks say there isn't a connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam what they're saying is that there isn't a known connection between Bin Laden and Saddam; which is true. Bin Laden is known to dislike Saddam as a person since he doesn't hold to Bin Laden's strict Islamic beliefs. The problem with that view is that there is plenty of evidence for ties between Saddam, Al Qaeda in general, and other terrorist organizations. If you limit the definition of "terrorist ties" and "having WMD" it's fully possible to claim that Saddam didn't possess either. The problem is that people are using that definition to further their political agenda and to justify their hatred of Bush to unreasonable and illogical lengths. [This message has been edited by Gump (edited January 17, 2005).] |
Klown Member Posts: 78 From: baraga, mi , united states of america Registered: 11-10-2004 |
What a lot of people dont like about this war with Iraq, is that it was unjust to a point. We just started the war on terror and trying to eliminate Osama. So we storm Afghanistan to try to kill him and his terror network. Yet we was there if we're lucky 6months before we start the war with Iraq. I've said many times that I'm glad Sadam is out of power (yet he's legally running for presidant again from what I read). Our military is sooo stretched out and worn down, we're lucky our troops arent dead of fitigue. Plenty of other ways Bush could have done this without just jumping into war. Elections going on or planned to be going in Iraq has been trying to happen since July. With all the street fighting and bombings. They've been delayed so much it's worse then the fighting over in Isreal. It'll be a long time before there is an actual Iraqi government running the nation. ------------------ |
CobraA1 Member Posts: 926 From: MN Registered: 02-19-2001 |
quote: From his jail cell? Would we even allow that?
quote: I've been hearing "January" for - like - forever. I'm not seeing any delays. ------------------ Switch Mayhem now available! Get it here [This message has been edited by CobraA1 (edited January 20, 2005).] |
Simon_Templar Member Posts: 330 From: Eau Claire, WI USA Registered: 10-25-2004 |
If people object to the war in Iraq on practical grounds of some sort, thats at least reasonable. However, the objections many raise that it is an unjust war or that we are waging war on civilians and innocents. I find both of these objections to be without basis, especially the later of the two. As for claiming that the US is making war on civilians, this is simply ignorant swallowing of propaganda (and I'm not saying anyone in here has claimed this, but its something I encounter all the time from people in every day life). The US army has been at pains to avoid all possible collateral damage. Even to the point of endangering our own soldiers. The level of restraint and precaution taken by our military in this campaign is unique in all of history. I don't demand that everyone support the war, or think its the best idea.. in fact there have been many times, even from the beginning of the war that I questioned it and thought it wasn't the best idea, there's been many times I have thought we should pull out. In the end I think we will pull out, and as soon as we do Iraq will fall apart and be torn to peices by the Iranians (or shi'ites backed by Iran) and the turkish. of all the arguments against the war, quite possibly the worst I have heard is that we are doing all this for oil. The US has shelled out billions of dollars and we have received nothing in return in the way of oil concessions or profits of other kind. This argument is the fall back of people who have lost touch with reality. The facts of our diplomatic record show that the US has even gone against its own best interests in terms of oil in a number of cases in the inerest of doing what was right. ------------------ |
GUMP Member Posts: 1335 From: Melbourne, FL USA Registered: 11-09-2002 |
Klown, what is your news source? I'm not faulting you but it sounds like the writer you're basing your opinion on has a definite agenda. 1. Bush didn't just "jump into a war". The whole situation was brewing for over a decade and came to a head with UN resolution 1441, which was not instigated by Bush but by many nations. Both major political party's in the US were united at the time, condemning Saddam and demanding military action. It wasn't until later that Bush's political opponents sniffed out an opportunity and did an abrupt about-face. The biggest problem facing the rebuilding of Iraq is not its government - it's quite amazing how they've managed to keep to the established timetable, write a constitution based upon the ideals of a representative Republic, and formally hand over power to the Iraqi governing council despite all the opposition. The problem is, the Coalition is falling behind when it comes to building a secular and powerful military in Iraq, one capable of holding the nation together and yet willing to protect the democratic government. As of now training this new military has "fallen behind" schedule and it will most likely take 4 to 5 years before the Iraqis can protect themselves. The Coalition apparently doesn't have the resources to construct a democratic state, protect the state, and rebuild the military all at the same time at the rate THEY WANT TO ACHIEVE. The pace they have set is amazing when compared to nation rebuliding examples like Japan and Germany after WW2 (which, btw, the NY Times repeatedly claimed would fail). The problem is that the average person has completely unrealistic expectations of how long such reconstruction takes. Under pressure by the people politicians might pull the Coalition out of Iraq earlier than adviseable. If the Coalition pulls out early and the fledgling Iraqi government falls after they leave I'm only going to blame the UN and the nations who refused, and still refuse, to help out of sheer greed. The resources and additional troops they could provide could significantly alter the outcome. Do a search on "food for oil scandal". All this exposure has forced U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan to call for an "independent" inquiry... but appointed by Annan himself. This is a problem since Annan's own son is implicated in this Scandal, as well as France, Russia, and Germany (the primary countries against the action against Saddam). Never mind that French and Russian oil companies possessed oil contracts with Saddam Hussein, amounting to 40% of Iraq's oil industry. Follow the money trail and you can easily see the real reason for their being against the 49 nations in the Coalition. A couple months back, the Iraqi Oil Ministry released a partial list of beneficiaries: 270 names of individuals, political entities, and companies from across the world who received bribes from Saddam Hussein's regime. The list includes former French Interior Minister Charles Pasqua, the "director of the Russian President's office," the Russian Communist Party, the Ukraine Communist Party, the Palestine Liberation Organization, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the son of Lebanese President Emile Lahud, the son of Syrian Defense Minister Mustafa Tlass, and George Galloway, a British Member of Parliament and on and on. The Russian government alone is alleged to have received an astonishing $1.36 billion in oil "vouchers" aka bribes from Saddam Hussein. |
Klown Member Posts: 78 From: baraga, mi , united states of america Registered: 11-10-2004 |
I will appologize. I did get the two mixed up. Sorry, havent really been feeling well the past couple of days and getting a few things mixed together. It was the hand over that was/happened in July, not the elections. (my big error there, sorry) the elections are supposed to happen in time and on schedual. Sorry, another error i made. Yes I know Sadam cannot run for election. I know that, I'm just saying Sadam put his name to become president and if he would beable to run, from what i've read, He would win. That was some thing i read about a month before I started posting here. I will admit that i dont think Bush has had the right agenda for the US in the whole thing. Sadam should have been out of power back when his daddy was pres. Yet I still believe this war right now could have waited atleast until we had Afghanistan more undercontrol and settled before we stormed Iraq. All we did is weaken our own military and spread them to far out and over working them. Even tho they're doing one hell of a killer job right now. Even tho they're fighting in city streets where there should be no fighting. Saying the war is for oil. Just stupid, yet we cant open everyone's mind up and show them why it's really happening. Even tho Bush has changed his mind a few times on why we're fighting the war. Now that major info has leaked out. We might finally get better people in the U.N. With a few things I've read and seen on CNN, there have been a few people in the U.N. that has been paid off by Sadam and his regem. Also there are a few U.S. ambasadors and senators that have been paid off by him too. Once we start to get them slime ball corrupt idiots out and get better people in there. We might ever have to do what we did in Iraq ever again. ------------------ |
That_Guy Member Posts: 30 From: TN,USA Registered: 02-26-2005 |
quote: Whose avatar looks looks like a pentagram? And going to war for America is not exactly a Christian thing to do, You should be serving God not devoting four years your life to who the a man voted president by people of the world. No ovensee to the troops, it is honorable to be willing to die for your country, I just don't think Christians should kill. ------------------ |
D-SIPL Moderator Posts: 1345 From: Maesteg, Wales Registered: 07-21-2001 |
it's not a pentegram it's a heartagram. I think Bam Margera stole it off a band called HIM. Ville Valo the lead singer smacked him out at Download festival because of it. Anyways they are completely different, but both probably satanic --D-SIPL ------------------
|
GUMP Member Posts: 1335 From: Melbourne, FL USA Registered: 11-09-2002 |
Luther wrote a booklet titled Whether a Soldier Too Can Be Saved, taking up the issue of whether a Christian, who is supposed to love his enemies, should join the military, where he has the duty of killing them. According to Romans 13, Luther argued, God has appointed earthly rulers to restrain sin and has given them the authority to "bear the sword." The soldier, acting under a lawful chain of command under the authority of the state, therefore has a legitimate calling from God, who Himself acts through human vocations. Luther says the soldier should look at it this way: "It is not I that smite, stab, and slay, but God and my prince, for my hand and my body are now their servants." The Christian soldier, living out his faith in his vocation, loves and serves his neighbors by defending and protecting them. Yes, soldiers can abuse their license to kill. Luther goes so far as to say that soldiers should refuse to fight in wars that are clearly evil. But those who have the Christian vocation of being a soldier may fight "in good conscience." Before God soldiers should be humble and repentant. But before the enemy, they should "smite them with a confident and untroubled spirit." Soldiers, Luther says, should go "forward with joy!" Exodus 15:3 The Lord is a man of war Obviously you cannot focus on one verse. God is a God of both grace and justice. There is inter-personal conflicts where your ability to witness could be harmed by taking spiteful vengeance. Then there are criminals who need to be brought to justice. The hard part is finding the balance. |
Simon_Templar Member Posts: 330 From: Eau Claire, WI USA Registered: 10-25-2004 |
To some degree I've "said my piece" on this topic already. I just wanted to add a couple, mainly historical, comments. The church, historicaly, has never taken a stand that christians should not be soldiers. This even extends to Jesus himself, who in the course of his ministry interacted with soldiers (even Roman soldiers) and did not direct them to give up their vocation or even comment on it negatively. It seems almost to have been a non issue with him. The church, and scripture, have always allowed soldier as a true vocation (even when serving non christian leaders), but one that comes at a cost. Traditionaly that cost was that serving as a soldier and particularly shedding blood disqualified a person from being ordained as a member of the priesthood/clergy. In short the bible and the church both allow that the vocation of a soldier is necessary, and is not inherintly sinful, and in some cases is even a service to God. However, both also have always taught that it is wrong to be a man of violence. As with many things in christianity, the christian soldier is something of a paradox (not a contradiction), a soldier who does his duty with conviction and passion but does not love violence and prefers mercy whenever possible. ------------------ |
eucaliptus_boy Junior Member Posts: 5 From: Sydney, N.S.W, Australia Registered: 05-08-2005 |
Now I am slitely anoyed by the two topics on the Heartagram. Dose it seem satonic to have a heart with a triangle through it? I dont think so, I think it means power & Beauty/Kindness, Triangle meaning strength, heart meaning Beauty/ Kindness, any way I dont want to cause anger here, but I just wanted to get those facts, plus Bam didnt steal the heartaram he is just an obsessesed fan, plus villie and bam are mates, as also another statement is dosnt the Heartagram look a fair bit like the jewish, star of David? anyway, any complaints or outrage can be sent to my E-mail adress.. peace be to the world. ------------------ |
Jari Member Posts: 1471 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: 03-11-2005 |
This thread needs some verses since some people don't seem to read the NT. Matthew 5 : Matthew 26:
James 1 : Romans 12: Some OT: Deuteronomy 32: ------------------ [This message has been edited by Jari (edited May 09, 2005).] |
Jari Member Posts: 1471 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: 03-11-2005 |
quote: Since it reminds about other religion and God I would recommend you not to use/wear such things Exodus 20: ------------------ |
Jari Member Posts: 1471 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: 03-11-2005 |
1 Thessalonians 5: 8 But let us, who are of the day, be calm, having put on the breastplate of faith and love and the hope of salvation for a helmet. 9 For God has not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ, Ephesians 6: See, we do not fight against flesh and blood and yet our battle is against the world's rules. ------------------ |
CoolJ Member Posts: 354 From: ny Registered: 07-11-2004 |
More verses, maybe to balance some of the ones against war/fighting. I don't think the bible endorses us to actively pursue attacking other countries. But I also don't think the Bible rules out a nations need to use force to *defend* our country, (also oneself) during times of war or if attacked. I only quote here verses from the New Testiment - just to limit my search and to avoid all the warring going on in the Old Testiment: Luk 11:21 When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace: Act 10:22 And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Jews, was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee. Act 10:22 And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Jews, was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee. Mat 8:8 The centurion answered and said, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof: but speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed. Luk 14:31 Or what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand? I think its ok to be a soldier in defense of your country. It is also ok to protect your life or your family's if attacked. And also ok to be a police officer, bodyguard, security officer, etc.. Yes this is the way of the world and 'worldly' professions. Sometimes police officers and military kill and sometimes they are killed. But are these people killing out of their 'wrath' or to defend and protect, and ultimately out of love. I think this a defining point. Just as the centerions of Jesus's day, many soldiers know that their life here on earth could be forfieted because of their choice to defend and protect our country and loved ones from people and nations that are actively warring against us because of our beliefs. But its good to konw that there are many times the Apostles were saved from certain death by their faith in God. Though they suffered tremedous persecution, many times, God delivered them out of these situations without them having to use force/violence. |
Jari Member Posts: 1471 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: 03-11-2005 |
quote: You have to read before those verses to understand their true meaning.
quote: Jesus spoke about kindom and house and how they fall if they are divided against their selfs...
quote: ... But what he ment was that demons cant cast out a demons.
quote: I believe he means a man who is prepared to defend his house physically...
quote: ... But a demon is the stronger one that overcomes him!
quote: Jesus probably mentions this because what people said in verse 15.
quote: So if a Christian goes against Christian they are according to this both for God?
quote: This was the last verse about demons. After this the subject was changed.
quote: Even Jesus didn't say anything about him being soldier that doesn't mean it was ok by him. In John 8 a woman who had committed an adultery was brought in front of Jesus but Jesus didn't Judge her either.
quote: This is just an example it doesnt mean war is ok.
quote: I think Jesus said this because following him isnt a little thing but requires a lot of determination to give up your life. And if you don't hate your self when you want to follow Jesus you haven't prepared your self.
quote: Why don't you trust God?
quote: Yes, Jesus said that we as Christians will face hard times and Bible mentions on how prophecies we're killed which can happen but we are not lost when our body dies, are we? No we are saved. But if we kill some one who isn't saved....? We deny he's second change! God gives us all second change and forgives our sins! But if we kill some one we denying hes second change!
quote:
quote:
[This message has been edited by Jari (edited May 10, 2005).] |
Jari Member Posts: 1471 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: 03-11-2005 |
Here's OT. You cant argue with these verses or can you? Deuteronomy 32: Please give it time... ------------------ |
GUMP Member Posts: 1335 From: Melbourne, FL USA Registered: 11-09-2002 |
Easily. Supporting the Law isn't about vengeance and retribution. Having said that, it's obvious God hates war but empowers his children when needed. You're not going to find Biblical support saying that you should never go to war, but for the circumstances/motivations for when you should or should not. |
Ereon Member Posts: 1018 From: Ohio, United States Registered: 04-12-2005 |
I don't think that God supports war at all. Here is my evidence. Joshua 5:13-14 " And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, [Art] thou for us, or for our adversaries? And he said, Nay; but [as] captain of the host of the LORD am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my lord unto his servant? " I think this explains Gods view of war. When Joshua asked whether the angel fought for him or against him, the angel simply answered "No".To me at least, this speaks volumes. God is not willing that anyone should perish, therefore, as far is war is concerned, he is not "on" one side or another. As far as I go, I think President Bush is a man of God, and that his action evince a great amount of faith and wisdom. This doen't mean he's perfect, but in this case I'm pretty sure that he did the right thing. If you think of this from the position of the Body of Christ this is a great thing. We are supposed to feel for our brothers and sisters who are in persecution, as bound with them, and this is a great chance to ease the pain of the Body, ending the torture and imprisonment of our spiritual siblings, as well as a chance to open them up and make them able to minister out in the open in a much freer (but probably still hostile) environment. THIS, I think is the way to fight tyranny, and win a war in a way that will bless the heart of God, and stay true to his "No" nature, which longs that every person be saved, and that none perish. ------------------ The old that is stong does not wither From the ashes a fire shall be woken Renewed shall be blade that was broken |
CoolJ Member Posts: 354 From: ny Registered: 07-11-2004 |
Jari, I don't disagree with you, I know that we are to obey God and love our enemies, and I do believe God can deliver whole nations out of conflict without bloodshed. But I am still learning, and I DO want to do what is God's will. How do you read verses like the following. To me it seems that God has given nations the power to resist evil and this might be by the sword? Rom 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Also, could this be similar to if we have faith enough God will heal us. Yet, we use doctors and medicines instead of relying on God's supernatural power to heal us miraclously? |
Jari Member Posts: 1471 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: 03-11-2005 |
quote: Many people see it that way but it's not the case. I didn't understand these verses correctly at the first place either but then I found this exelent explanation, read it and you understand: See? God is the only authority, not the state. We cannot have two masters: Matthew 6:
quote: I don't think they are related. That's a really good subject though, about what we can get through our faith from God. Mark 11: Mark 16:
God bless you all and remember to pray for wisdom.
[This message has been edited by Jari (edited May 10, 2005).] |
GUMP Member Posts: 1335 From: Melbourne, FL USA Registered: 11-09-2002 |
It's not a good sign when you're ignoring context, mixing verses not directly related to each other, and extrapolating your philosophy from "interesting" interpretations of single verses. You cannot deny that God specifically ordered His people to engage in war, wipe out whole groups of people, and supported many battles. As a loving God of justice, He "probably" (my view on motives may not necessarily be true) hates war just as he hated causing the Flood, but those actions were necessary due to OUR actions, OUR sins. Now, if you want to argue the Bible supports the position that Christians should not engage in war unless directly authorized by God, then that is at least semi-debateable. [This message has been edited by Gump (edited May 10, 2005).] |
Ereon Member Posts: 1018 From: Ohio, United States Registered: 04-12-2005 |
The hard thing is WHEN does God authorize it? That's a shaky and dangerous subject, easily exploited if great care isn't taken. ------------------ |
buddboy Member Posts: 2220 From: New Albany, Indiana, U.S. Registered: 10-08-2004 |
wow.... i didn't read this whole post because i just wanted to get in a reply!! but... wow!! yah, the heartagram is cool!! and i didn't know that about the swastika... so i guess that whole "it looks like a twisted cross" thing isn't really important... didn't really buy that anyway... i totally support the war in iraq!! it's a GOOD thing!! we freed the iraqi people! they're free from his crazy dictatorship regime!! and yes, we were cheered when we went in!! they tore down his statues! i mean, we freed a boundup people... now they can be evangelized to! they were part of the 10/40 window i think... my dad said that Saddam Hussein is a murderer's butcher, and i have to agree with him... oh, and that whole Osama thing... crazy! he's not really doing anything now... and we did take out a good bit of teh Al Qaeda people... well, that's all i have to say for now! ------------------ |
Realm Master Member Posts: 1971 From: USA Registered: 05-15-2005 |
Time to break out the serious RM: *siiiggghhh...* This is no easy question. People were killed, yes, and people continue to die. Some say it was none of our buisness, some say it is. But were in this war waist-deep weather we like it or not. What happens if we pull out of iraq? Give Osama back control? let him torture and kill? Let him WIN? If he wins, he will want to win again!! He'll attack again and again because he knows we won't fight! People die in wars, yes, its horrible, its tragic, but to err is to be human. wars can be errs, but wars can be helpful. If we win, we eradicate Osama, and we could stop terrorism else where, and Iraq will be free to do what they want, even if they fall back into terrorism. but if we leave know, what will happen? the Iraqi police forces and Iraqi millitary are TRAINED BY US FORCES. If we pull out then they lose. They might have survivign forces to train upcoming millitary and police, but if they dont, then their army and police foreces will fall into ruins, and the terrorists will reign supreme and will have the confidence that they can defeat anybody! The US has the biggest millitary, if they can beat us, they can beat anybody! (or nearly anybody, russias got more land that us. though... im not sure what that has do do with anything... more ppl perhaps? =\) hehh.. even i don't have a define yes or no on this one... ------------------ Blessed are those who suffer for doing what is right. PM ME YOUR DESCRIPTION OF ME! ILL PUT IT HERE! |
Ereon Member Posts: 1018 From: Ohio, United States Registered: 04-12-2005 |
The only thing I have trouble with is that I don't trust government. It's vital to the safety of all but it's just too easy for it to get corrupted and twisted and used. Almost everything we hear from Iraq is the view of some particular government, biased to make you see what they WANT you to see. Government is just volatial in general, it's just part of it's nature, and human nature in general. I don't mean to sound like a pessimist or anything, I'm just trying to be wise and careful. ------------------ |
Simon_Templar Member Posts: 330 From: Eau Claire, WI USA Registered: 10-25-2004 |
For the most part all of the christian "pacifist" arguments turn upon the idea that war and fighting necessarily involve hating the enemy, and taking vengence. This, however, is not true. C.S. Lewis actually writes a section on this very topic in his book Mere Christianity (if memory serves) in which he discusses loving enemies. He was a soldier in WWI and he specificly uses the example of loving the german soldiers and he imagines an instance where he and a believing german soldier would come face to face and kill each other and a moment later be united in the afterlife, laughing over the irony of their situation. This is not to suggest that there is no savagery, hatred, or vengence in war.. those things are often the rule. Especially because most people are not christian and even christians fail in behavior under stress. However, as a student of the history of war it is one of the constant and consistent surprises to find the humanity and compassion with which many soldiers have viewed their enemies. ------------------ |
CheeseStorm Member Posts: 521 From: Registered: 11-28-2004 |
War sucks, but letting the baddies have their way sucks more. Not to mention that their idea of war is intentionally blowing up children while hiding from a fair fight. I would hate to get pulled into a war but I'm sorry my country (Canada) didn't back you guys up in Iraq. |